Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;8:804663. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.804663

Table 3.

P-values and significance of year-to-year variation in maize grain yield and mineral content between the 2018–19 and 2019–20 conservation agriculture trials.

Treatment Yield Carbon Nitrogen Iron Potassium Magnesium Manganese Phosphorus Zinc Selenium
T1 0.008** 0.018* 0.766 0.020* 0.384 0.353 0.202 0.339 0.948 0.284
T2 0.019* 0.024* 0.997 0.453 0.328 0.772 0.764 0.176 0.020* 0.496
T3 0.011* 0.042* 0.085 0.626 0.744 0.954 0.521 0.653 0.349 0.325
T4-5 0.035* 0.050 0.234 0.775 0.020* 0.023* 0.007** 0.004** 0.020* 0.002**
T6 0.065 0.025* 0.082 0.136 0.198 0.203 0.033* 0.022* 0.051 0.123
T7 0.095 0.010* 0.900 0.418 0.216 0.101 0.057 0.067 0.075 0.405
T8 0.039* 0.391 0.587 0.401 0.108 0.717 0.802 0.508 0.106 0.590
* and **

mean significant at 0.05 and 0.01, respectively, paired two-tailed t-test. Treatments: T1 = conventional agriculture; sole maize. T2 = conservation agriculture (CA); basin sowing; sole maize. T3 = CA; dibble stick sowing; sole maize. T4–5 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-cowpea rotation. T6 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-pigeon pea intercrop. T7 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-cowpea intercrop. T8 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-velvet bean intercrop.