Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 7;115(2):456–470. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab339

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of clusters representing joint temporal dietary and physical activity patterns of US adults aged 20–65 y as drawn from the NHANES, 2003–20061

Characteristics Total, n Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 P value2
Total 1836 256 (14.0) 678 (36.9) 472 (25.7) 430 (23.4)
Survey year 0.19
 2003–2004 895 (49.3) 131 (54.0) 338 (51.2) 222 (45.5) 204 (48.0)
 2005–2006 941 (50.7) 125 (46.0) 340 (48.8) 250 (54.5) 226 (52.0)
Sex <0.0001*
 Male 933 (49.5) 197 (73.4) 226 (32.0) 202 (39.8) 308 (70.3)
 Female 903 (50.5) 59 (26.6) 452 (68.0) 270 (60.2) 122 (29.7)
Race/ethnicity 0.09
 Mexican American 389 (8.4) 54 (10.0) 142 (7.6) 107 (8.9) 86 (8.1)
 Other Hispanic 57 (3.2) 11 (4.5) 16 (2.6) 18 (3.9) 12 (2.6)
 Non-Hispanic white 910 (71.5) 127 (71.0) 325 (69.3) 229 (71.7) 229 (74.5)
 Non-Hispanic black 385 (10.5) 56 (11.3) 149 (11.4) 96 (10.0) 84 (9.4)
 Other 95 (6.4) 8 (3.2) 46 (9.1) 22 (5.5) 19 (5.4)
Age group, y <0.0001*
 20–34 560 (29.4) 122 (44.9) 138 (20.0) 162 (32.5) 138 (29.8)
 35–49 623 (38.2) 93 (37.2) 193 (34.8) 173 (40.1) 164 (41.4)
 50–65 653 (32.4) 41 (18.0) 347 (45.2) 137 (27.3) 128 (28.8)
Household PIR 0.007*
 0–0.99 288 (9.9) 39 (10.5) 136 (13.2) 57 (7.2) 56 (7.8)
 1.00–2.99 427 (18.0) 62 (19.3) 161 (20.4) 116 (17.2) 88 (14.6)
 2.00–2.99 280 (15.9) 40 (17.6) 111 (16.0) 73 (16.9) 56 (13.4)
 3.00–3.99 277 (17.1) 39 (14.3) 94 (17.3) 79 (18.7) 65 (16.9)
 4.00–4.99 168 (11.1) 24 (11.0) 50 (9.1) 39 (9.8) 55 (15.3)
 ≥5.00 396 (28.1) 52 (27.3) 126 (24.0) 108 (30.2) 110 (31.9)
BMI3 <0.0001*
 Underweight 24 (1.6) 4 (2.2) 10 (1.7) 6 (1.3) 4 (1.5)
 Normal weight 519 (31.1) 103 (43.1) 164 (28.0) 146 (34.4) 106 (24.7)
 Overweight 630 (33.5) 94 (36.9) 205 (28.4) 181 (37.3) 150 (34.5)
 Obese 663 (33.8) 55 (17.8) 299 (41.8) 139 (27.0) 170 (39.4)
1

Values are unweighted sample sizes and weighted percentages except for the total cluster size percentage. The percentages may not add up to 100% owing to rounding. *Significant difference: P < 0.05. PIR, poverty to income ratio.

2

Rao–Scott F adjusted χ2 test is a goodness-of-fit, 1-sided test. Analyses were adjusted for aspects of survey design including stratification, clustering, and weight.

3

BMI: categories were classified based on the WHO (95).