Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 22;115(2):407–421. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab353

TABLE 2.

Clinical data for the study population for infants by formula exposure in the meta-analysis cohorts1

Human milk, n = 106 Any formula, n = 90 Difference in means between groups2
Infant antibiotic treatment 50 54
Infant ampicillin 49 54
Infant gentamycin 42 53 3
Infant vancomycin 18 9
Infant cefotaxime 7 9
Infant clindamycin 0 2
Infant cefazolin 0 1
Infant ofloxacin 0 1
Infant meropenem 0 1
Infant ticarcillin clavulanate 2 1
No maternal antibiotic treatment 22 31
Maternal antibiotic treatment 34 40
Delivery mode cesarean 41 57
Delivery mode vaginal 65 33
16S rRNA gene counts median (IQR) 26,346 (7598–36,040) 38,820 (22,106–58,453) 3
Sex female 59 53
Sex male 47 37
Infant age, days, median (IQR) 7.0 (2.25–14.172) 7.0 (4.00–10.75)
Fortifier4 16 8
Donor milk 2 2
Gestational age, weeks, median (IQR) 37 (28–40.0) 31 (29–37.75)
Necrotizing enterocolitis 3 7
Maternal preeclampsia 16 8
1

n = 196. The table shows the major clinical parameters by diet for the meta-analysis cohorts. Supplemental Data 3 has all collected metadata.

2

The column entitled “Difference between groups” indicates instances where the groups were not balanced (Student's t-test).

3Significant difference between groups

4

Infants who received fortifier but did not receive formula were excluded from analyses for the effect of formula making the n = 180.