Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;2(1):e91. doi: 10.1002/deo2.91

TABLE 3.

Univariate and Multivariate analysis for the factors associated with the difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) including long procedure time (≥50 min), operator change, and perforation

Univariate Multivariate
No. of Patients No. of events OR 95% CI p‐value OR 95% CI p‐value
Location
Lower 32 7 1 Ref 0.053 1 Ref 0.051
Upper or middle 36 16 2.9 0.98–8.3 3.34 0.96–11.7
Position
L or A or P 39 10 1 Ref 0.10 1 Ref 0.10
G 29 13 2.4 0.84–6.6 2.7 0.82–8.8
Estimated size
<950 mm 2 48 14 1 Ref 0.21 1 Ref 0.27
≥950 mm 2 20 9 2.0 0.68–5.8 2.1 0.56–7.9
Operator skill
≥50 cases 31 6 1 Ref 0.024 1 Ref 0.022 a
0–49 cases 37 17 3.5 1.2–10.6 3.9 1.16–13.4
Method
P‐ESD 33 8 1 Ref 0.076 1 Ref 0.029 a
C‐ESD 33 15 2.6 0.90–7.3 3.8 1.1–13.0
a

significant value

Abbreviations: A, anterior wall; C‐ESD, conventional ESD; CI, confidence interval; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; G, greater curvature; L, lessor curvature; OR, odds ratio; P, posterior wall; P‐ESD, ProKnife injection ESD.