TABLE 2.
Author/year | Method | Number of patients, n | Technical success rate, % (n) | Clinical success rate, % (n) | Procedure time, min | Adverse event rate, % | Stent patency (mean, days) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paik a /2018 19 |
ERCP EUS‐CDS |
64 33 |
90.2 (55/61) 90.6 (29/32) |
94.5 (52/55) 87.5 (28/32) |
11 (median) 5 b (median) |
19.7 6.3 |
165 208 |
Bang/2018 20 |
ERCP EUS‐CDS |
34 33 |
94.1 (32/34) 90.9 (30/33) |
91.2 (31/34) 97.0 (32/33) |
21 (median) 25 (median) |
14.7 21.2 |
170 182 |
Park/2018 26 |
ERCP EUS‐CDS |
14 14 |
100 (14/14) 92.8 (13/14) |
92.8 (13/14) 100 (13/13) |
31 (mean) 43 (mean) |
0 0 |
403 379 |
Abbreviations: BD, biliary drainage; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EUS‐CDS, endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy; ND; not described.
Among EUS‐BD, hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) patients are excluded.
Including EUS‐HGS cases.