Table 2.
Study | Referral, Access, Retention, Or Effectiveness | Population Focus | Study Setting, Sample Size | Gateway or Referral source | Type of Substance Use Disorder | Study Design | Objective(s) | Key Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alemi et al., 199642 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women | Clinical setting, not specified (n=179) | Health care provider, not specified | Cocaine | Prospective cohort; Qualitative interview | Assess the intervention that used computer services to inform and motivate patients | • The intervention did not lead to significant change in patients’ health status, drug use, or utilization of services; however, it did increase SUD treatment engagement • SUD treatment engagement did not reduce drug or alcohol use |
Messer et al., 199648 | Access | Pregnant women | Prenatal care clinic (n=182) | Health care provider | Alcohol or other drugs | Cross-sectional | Explore the characteristics of pregnant women who used SUD treatment service vs. women who declined to participate | • 51% of eligible pregnant women participated in the SUD treatment service • Among women with low SES, Black women, women with more children, women with greater severity of SUD, individuals who use cocaine, and women who have previously received SUD treatment were more likely to participate in this SUD treatment service |
Klein and Zahnd, 199722 | Referral; Access | Pregnant women | Public agencies and community organizations (n=401) | Families with Dependent Children, health clinics, SNAP, refuges, jails, and programs for teenagers | Alcohol or other drugs | Qualitative interview | Explore alcohol and drug use patterns, and problems and unmet service needs (including treatment) | • More than half of the sample came from the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), followed by health clinics, SNAP, and refuges, jails, and programs for teenagers • The following service needs were found: job placement, educational programs, and housing • 64% had not participated in formal treatment or 12 step program • Among women who were not in treatment, they did not want treatment due to: financial barriers, legal problems, did not know what treatment was available/how to get into treatment, and/or had no transportation or child care. |
Whiteside et al., 199940 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women and mothers | SUD treatment (n=105) | N/A | Alcohol or other drugs | Prospective cohort | Assess the Arkansas Center for Addictions Research, Education, and Services (AR-CARES) | • The AR-CARES evolved over a 5-year period and responded to the needs of the target population (pregnant women and parenting women with SUD) • Added residential facilities, mental health counseling, child care, early intervention for children, and transportation to the treatment program • Decreased maternal substance use and lowered incidence of premature labor and maternal infections |
Weisdorf et al., 199945 | Retention; Effectiveness | Pregnant women | SUD treatment (n=500) | N/A | Cocaine | Retro-spective cohort | Evaluate the Pregnancy Substance Abuse Program (PSAP) | • The PSAP increased treatment retention • Successful factors include: counselor continuity, treatment coordination and group continuity across levels of care, pregnancy and women specific treatment groups, child-care options, and increased emphasis on outpatient treatment |
Kissin et al., 200149 | Access | Pregnant women | SUD treatment (n=240) | Social services | Opioid or cocaine | Cross-sectional | Explore the characteristics of pregnant women in SUD treatment | • Participants were likely to be Black, low income, urban women with opioid use disorder in their late twenties who voluntarily entered treatment • They were surrounded by others, often family members, with substance use disorder problems • They were less likely to have a full-time employment and many received income from the Department of Social Services |
Nishimoto et al., 200138 | Retention | Pregnant women and Mothers | SUD treatment (n=252) | Child Protective Services (CPS), local hospitals, social services, self-referrals | Alcohol or other drugs | Randomized controlled trial | Examine the relationship between various indicators of coercion and treatment retention and whether those relationships vary by treatment modality | • 83% of the sample were referred from the CPS; 8% from local hospitals; 6% from social agencies; 2.8% were self-referrals • Women who had custody were more likely to stay in treatment compared to women who did not have custody |
Hohman et al., 200320 | Referral | Pregnant women | SUD treatment (n=678) | CPS | Alcohol or other drugs | Retro-spective cohort | Describe the demographic, substance use, and treatment variables and to compare these variables based on CPS status | • Mandated status, unsatisfactory exit status, and cocaine use were associated with CPS referrals • CPS has additional requirements beyond the treatment requirements |
Tuten et al., 200350 | Retention | Pregnant women | SUD treatment (n=235) | Social services | Alcohol or other drugs | Cross-sectional | Compare homeless and domiciled pregnant women with SUD on treatment outcomes | • Homeless women with SUD had lower retention rates, received only 65% of the social services income compared to domiciled women • Homeless pregnant women with SUD may be lacking resources compared to domiciled women |
Grella et al., 2006 21 | Referral | Mothers | SUD treatment (n=4,156) | Healthcare provider, CPS, social services, employer | Alcohol or other drugs | Cross-sectional | Compare the characteristics of mothers in treatment who were and were not involved with child welfare services | • Women engaged in child welfare services were younger, had more children, had lower levels of addiction severity, but were more likely to be economically unstable compared to women not engaged in child welfare services • Women who were involved with child welfare services were less likely to cite an individual (i.e., self, family, or friends) or another treatment provider as the source of referral to treatment, and had a higher rate of being referred by another organization or service provider (i.e., health care provider, child welfare, social services, employer) |
Conners et al., 2006 41 | Retention; Effectiveness | Pregnant women and mothers | SUD treatment (n=305) | Criminal justice system | Alcohol or other drugs | Prospective cohort | Evaluate AR-CARES program on women in the areas of substance use, consequences of use, employment, legal involvement, mental health symptoms, risky sexual behavior, and parenting attitudes. | • AR-CARES improved LOS and resulted in positive outcomes (lower substance use, higher self-sufficiency, improved parenting attitudes, and fewer symptoms of depression and PTSD) • About 33% of women were legally pressured to enter treatment • Most women entered treatment with a criminal record, and more than half (59.5%) were arrested in the year before intake, a quarter (24.3%) were rearrested after treatment |
Pollack & Reuter, 2006 23 | Referral; Effectiveness | Pregnant women and mothers | National Survey | CPS, social services | Alcohol or other drugs | Retro-spective cohort | Evaluate the association between welfare receipt and treatment | • Welfare settings are important access points to treatment for low-income women (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)) |
O’Connor & Whaley, 2007 18 | Effectiveness; Referral | Pregnant women | Supplemental Nutrition Program (n=255) | Social services, Community programs | Alcohol | Randomized controlled trial | Examine the efficacy of brief intervention | • Brief intervention by nonmedical professionals (i.e., nutritionists) successfully increased pregnant women’s motivation to change alcohol drinking behavior • Community programs like Public Health Foundation Enterprises Management Solutions Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (SNAP-WIC) can be instrumental in preventing alcohol-exposed pregnancies |
Simons, 2008 37 | Retention | Pregnant women and mothers | SUD treatment (n=80) | N/A | Alcohol or other drugs | Retro-spective cohort | Measure differences in characteristics and outcomes between treatment completers versus non-completers | • Women who completed treatment had higher rates of alcohol consumption, arrests for public intoxication, family support, lower mental health problems, higher rates of childhood emotional neglect, and higher rates of medication. • Mental health comorbidity is a big barrier to treatment completion, especially among Black women |
Morgenstern et al., 2009 19 | Effectiveness; Referral | Mothers | Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (n=452) | Social services | Alcohol or other drugs | Randomized controlled trial | Evaluate the impact of intensive case management program among women with SUD receiving TANF. | • Intensive case management program increased abstinence rates through 24 months of follow-up, and improved full-time employment rates among women receiving TANF • Treatment likely improves abstinence, which impacts later employment |
Dakof et al., 2010 31 | Effectiveness | Mothers | Drug court, (n=62) |
Criminal justice system, CPS | Alcohol or other drugs | Randomized controlled trial | Evaluate the Engaging Moms Program (EMP) intervention | • EMP increased the likelihood of positive child welfare dispositions • Decreased substance use • Increased family functioning and enhanced parenting practices • Improved maternal mental and physical health |
Ondersma et al., 2010 36 | Retention | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=200) | N/A | Alcohol or other drugs | Randomized controlled trial | Analyze external pressure on retention in treatment and substance use | • Pregnant women who had external pressure were more likely to remain in treatment, attend more treatment sessions, less likely to use substances (less tested positive or report fewer days of use) |
Jackson and Shannon, 2012 27 | Access | Pregnant women | Tertiary hospital, detox (n=85) | Health care provider | Alcohol or other drugs | Cross-sectional | Identify barriers to treatment | • Over 80% of the sample reporting having experienced any barrier to treatment and the majority indicated having more than two barriers • The majority experienced acceptability and accessibility barriers |
McCabe et al., 2012 26 | Access | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=1,724,479) | Criminal justice system, health care provider | Alcohol or other drugs | Repeated cross-sectional | Characterize pregnant women entering SUD treatment | • Pregnant women were more likely to be younger, minority, never married, less educated, homeless, on public-assistance or have no income than nonpregnant women |
Meyer et al., 2012 43 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women | Tertiary hospital, (n=149) | Health care provider | Opioids | Cross-sectional | Determine whether increased access to medication for opioid use disorder and improved coordination of ancillary services for pregnant women improved perinatal outcomes | • The number of pregnant women receiving treatment increased • Improved maternal and perinatal outcome in the nonurban setting • Development of coordinated team care may improve outcomes |
Thompson et al., 2013 12 | Access | Mothers | CPS, (n=27) | CPS | Alcohol or other drugs | Qualitative interview | Evaluate the perspective of participants in the Parenting in Recovery (PIR) program | • Motivations behind participation include 1) the program would allow them to keep their children or be reunited with their children more quickly 2) to avoid a criminal investigation, arrest or jail |
Kuo et al., 2013 13 | Access; Retention | Pregnant women and mothers | SUD treatment, (n=18) | Social services, CPS | Alcohol or other drugs | Qualitative interview | Explore factors impacting treatment outcomes and needs | • Self-motivation, pregnancy, navigating family relationships, availability of community support (support groups and program for outpatient treatment) can facilitate treatment • Social support does not always facilitate treatment; agencies like Department of Children, Youth, and Their Families (DCYF) can be facilitative or challenging • Programs that address dual-diagnoses are promising |
Aklin et al., 2014 34 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women and mothers | SUD treatment, (n=40) | N/A | Opioids, cocaine | Randomized controlled trial | Evaluate the effects of a therapeutic workplace social business on drug abstinence and employment | • More cocaine- and opiate- negative urine samples than controls • Less money spent on drugs • More days employed • Higher employment income |
Lee King et al., 2015 10 | Access; Retention | Pregnant women | Primary care, (n=2,729) | Health care provider | Alcohol or other drugs | Cross-sectional | Determine clinical profiles of pregnant women in treatment for co-occurring disorders with current interpersonal abuse | • Pregnant women more likely to demonstrate social vulnerability than nonpregnant women • Less income |
Stone, 2015 14 | Referral; Access | Pregnant women and mothers | Community (Multiple settings including transportation hubs and healthcare settings) (n=30) | N/A | Alcohol or other drugs | Qualitative interview | Explore the experiences of substance-using mothers in health and criminal justice settings |
• Women managed their risk of detection by health or criminal justice authorities, including isolating themselves from others, skipping treatment appointments, or avoiding treatment altogether |
Angelotta et al., 2016 24 | Access; Referral | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=8,292) | Individual, Health care provider, Criminal justice system, Community | Opioids | Repeated cross-sectional | Analyze the relationship between the use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and state laws that criminalize substance use during pregnancy | • Half of pregnant women with opioid use disorder received MOUD • Pregnant women referred to treatment by the criminal justice system were least likely to receive MOUD |
Kahn et al., 2017 29 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women and mothers | SUD treatment, (n=75) | N/A | Opioids | Qualitative interview | Evaluate parenting education at MAT clinic | • Educational content was useful • Participants appreciated the social support provided by the groups |
Mittal et al., 2017 5 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women | Obstetric clinic, (n=14) | Health care provider | Opioids | Qualitative interview | Evaluate collaborative care treatment with buprenorphine | • Intervention is feasible • High retention rates • Only 6.9% had aberrant urine opioid screen at delivery |
Hand et al., 2017 28 | Access | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=8,656) | Criminal justice system | Alcohol or other drugs | Repeated cross-sectional | Characterize pregnant women entering treatment by geographical regions | • Women living in South are more likely to use benzos compared to those in other regions; less likely to use MOUD; less likely to use heroin and be injection drug users |
Washio et al., 2018 15 | Access | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=166,863) | Criminal justice system | Alcohol | Repeated cross-sectional | Characterize pregnant women who reported alcohol use entering treatment | • Pregnant women who use alcohol were more likely to be referred by the criminal justice system • Marijuana was the most popular co-used substance among pregnant women |
Saia et al., 2017 6 | Access | Pregnant women | Obstetric clinic, (n=310) | Health care provider | Opioids | Cross-sectional | Describe prenatal care and neonatal outcomes after the implementation of buprenorphine treatment at the clinic | • Increase in the volume of pregnant women treated and children with neonatal abstinence syndrome over time |
Brogly et al., 2018 35 | Access | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=113) | N/A | Opioids | Cross-sectional | Characterize pregnant women with OUD entering treatment | • Over half had been incarcerated in the past, 30% currently involved in legal proceedings, 15% have unstable housing |
Short et al., 2018 25 | Access; Referral | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n= 88,241) | Criminal justice system, self-referral | Opioids | Repeated cross-sectional | Analyze trends and disparities in receipt of MAT | • MOUD utilization is less likely among the employed, those in intensive outpatient or residential programs, referred from criminal justice or have co-occurring mental health illnesses |
Falleta et al., 2018 16 | Access; Referral | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n= 16) | CPS | Opioids | Qualitative interview | Understand currently or recently pregnant women’s perceptions of CPS in treatment | • Both positive and negative feelings toward CPS exist • CPS is client-focused and provides support but needs are not met and resources are not provided • Patient and caseworker relationship is important |
Ondersma et al., 2018 7 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women and mothers | Delivery unit, (n=500) | Health care provider | Prescrip-tion opioids, marijuana | Randomized controlled trial | Evaluate the efficacy of the computer-delivered brief intervention | • No evidence of efficacy for an indirect, single-session, computer-delivered, brief intervention designed as a complement to indirect screening |
Martino et al., 2018 8 | Effectiveness; Referral | Pregnant women and mothers | Reproductive health clinic, (n=439) | Health care provider | Alcohol or other drugs | Randomized controlled trial | Evaluate the efficacy of electronic or clinician based screening and brief interventions for referral to treatment | • Both e-SBIRT and SBIRT significantly reduced days of primary substance use over the follow-up period compared to usual care • No interaction with pregnancy |
O’Connor et al., 2018 11 | Retention | Pregnant women | Primary care, (n=190) | Health care provider | Alcohol or other drugs | Retro-spective Cohort | Characterize pregnant women’s treatment retention | • MOUD utilization before conception would likely improve treatment outcomes |
Cochran et al., 2018 32 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=21) | Health care provider | Opioids | Prospective cohort | Optimize and evaluate patient navigation intervention | • Significantly improved illicit opioid use abstinence and decreased in drug use and depression |
Clemans et al., 2019 33 | Access | Pregnant women | Health care setting, (n=72,086) | Health care provider | Opioids | Retro-spective cohort | Analyze maternal and infant care, Medicaid costs, and outcomes related to maternal OUD | • 75% of women with OUD had at least some treatment related to substance use but treatment was not continuous • Health care costs were higher for women with OUD than those with other substance use disorders |
Frazer et al., 2019 30 | Access | Pregnant women | SUD treatment, (n=20) | Friend/partner, Health care provider, Criminal justice system | Alcohol or other drugs | Qualitative interview | Identify motivators and barriers to treatment | • Motivators: readiness to stop using, concern for the baby’s health, concern about custody of the baby or other children, wanting to escape violent environments or homelessness, and seeking structure • Barriers: fear of loss of custody, not wanting to be away from children/partner, concern about stigma or privacy, and lack of childcare and transportation |
Shenai et al., 2019 9 | Effectiveness | Pregnant women | Antepartum unit, (n=31) | Health care provider | Alcohol or other drugs | Prospective cohort | Evaluate the efficacy of a brief education session | • All women reported multiple lifetime traumatic experiences • Session improved their knowledge about diagnoses • Increased likelihood of pursuing further dual treatment |