Table 5.

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the prevalence of the MHO phenotype according to dietary pattern score quartile in the obese group.

		Healthy dietary pattern				Alcohol dietary pattern
		n	Cases	Model 1	Model 2	n	Cases	Model 1	Model 2
				OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)			OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
Men and women combined
	Q1	247	41	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)	207	73	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)
	Q2	249	46	0.97 (0.59–1.60)	1.04 (0.62–1.77)	211	56	0.68 (0.43–1.08)	0.69 (0.42–1.14)
	Q3	238	67	1.52 (0.93–2.50)	1.45 (0.86–2.44)	226	54	0.82 (0.52–1.30)	0.84 (0.51–1.38)
	Q4	198	68	1.87 (1.10–3.18)	1.86 (1.06–3.25)	288	39	0.47 (0.29–0.77)	0.45 (0.26–0.76)
	P for trend			0.006	0.014			0.009	0.009
Men
	Q1	218	30	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)	92	18	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)
	Q2	180	18	0.80 (0.42–1.52)	0.75 (0.38–1.46)	121	12	0.41 (0.18–0.92)	0.38 (0.16–0.89)
	Q3	143	20	1.34 (0.71–2.55)	1.20 (0.61–2.34)	166	29	0.77 (0.39–1.51)	0.70 (0.34–1.43)
	Q4	82	17	2.48 (1.21–5.12)	2.15 (1.01–4.58)	244	26	0.44 (0.22–0.87)	0.44 (0.21–0.90)
	P for trend			0.018	0.057			0.091	0.129
Women
	Q1	29	11	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)	115	55	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)
	Q2	69	28	1.33 (0.53–3.35)	2.03 (0.73–5.66)	90	44	0.90 (0.50–1.60)	1.03 (0.55–1.96)
	Q3	95	47	1.91 (0.78–4.64)	2.29 (0.87–6.03)	60	25	0.77 (0.40–1.48)	0.88 (0.42–1.80)
	Q4	116	51	1.97 (0.81–4.81)	2.49 (0.94–6.59)	44	13	0.43 (0.19–0.95)	0.38 (0.16–0.91)
	P for trend			0.095	0.113			0.048	0.059

HOMA–IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; MVPA, moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity.

Model 1 was adjusted for age, marital status, educational status, household income, smoking status, MVPA, energy intake.

Model 2 was additionally adjusted for waist circumference and HOMA–IR.

P values were calculated using logistic regression analysis.

The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.