Summary of findings for the main comparison. Subcutaneous insulin lispro versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis.
Subcutaneous insulin lispro versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis | ||||||
Patient: participants with diabetic ketoacidosis Settings: emergency department and critical care unit Intervention: subcutaneous insulin lispro versus intravenous regular insulin | ||||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | |||||
Intravenous regular insulin | Subcutaneous insulin lispro | |||||
All‐cause mortality (N) Mean hospital stay: 2‐7 days |
See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 156 (4) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderatea | No deaths reported |
Hypoglycaemic episodes (N) Mean hospital stay: 2‐7 days |
118 per 1000 | 70 per 1000 (27 to 180) | RR 0.59 (0.23 to 1.52) | 156 (4) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ lowb | Comparable risk ratios for adults (4 trials) and children (1 trial) |
Morbidity (N) Mean hospital stay: 2‐7 days |
See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 96 (2) | See comment | No cases of cerebral oedema, venous thrombosis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, hyperchloraemic acidosis |
Adverse events other than hypoglycaemic episodes | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | See comment | See comment | Not investigated |
Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis (h) Mean hospital stay: 2‐4 days |
The mean time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis across the intravenous regular insulin groups was 11 h | The mean time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis in the subcutaneous insulin lispro groups was 0.2 h higher (1.7 h lower to 2.1 h higher) | ‐ | 90 (2) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very lowc | Metabolic acidosis and ketosis took longer to resolve in the subcutaneous insulin lispro group in 1 trial (60 children); no exact data published |
Patient satisfaction | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | See comment | See comment | Not investigated |
Socioeconomic effects: length of hospital stay (days) Mean hospital stay: 4‐7 days |
The mean length of hospital stay in the intravenous regular insulin groups ranged between 4 and 6.6 days | The mean length of hospital stay in the subcutaneous insulin lispro groups was 0.4 days shorter (1 day shorter to 0.2 days longer) | ‐ | 90 (2) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ lowd | US setting: treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in a non–intensive care setting (step‐down unit or general medicine ward) was associated with a 39% lower hospitalisation charge than was treatment with intravenous regular insulin in the intensive care unit (USD 8801 (SD USD 5549) vs USD 14,429 (SD USD 5243); the average hospitalisation charges per day were USD 3981 (SD USD 1067) for participants treated in an intensive care unit compared with USD 2682 (SD USD 636) for those treated in a non–intensive care setting |
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; h: hours; RR: risk ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. |
*Assumed risk was derived from the event rates in the comparator groups. aDowngraded by one level because of imprecision (see Appendix 12). bDowngraded by two levels because of risk of performance bias and serious imprecision (see Appendix 12). cDowngraded by three levels because of risk of performance bias, serious risk of inconsistency, and serious risk of imprecision (see Appendix 12). dDowngraded by two levels because of serious risk of imprecision (see Appendix 12).