Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 9;157(4):335–342. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.7554

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of 82 Patients Enrolled in OpACIN and OpACIN-neo.

Characteristic No. (%)a
Study
OpACIN 9 (11)
OpACIN-neo 73 (89)
Institute
NKI 42 (51)
MIA 38 (46)
KS 2 (2)
Age, median (range), y 58.5 (18-80)
Sex
Male 48 (59)
Female 34 (41)
Clinical tumor stage (AJCC 8th edition)
IIIB 51 (62)
IIIC 31 (38)
Previous lymph node surgical procedure
Previous sentinel node biopsy 25 (30)
Previous lymph node dissection 6 (8)
Location of affected lymph node
Neck 13 (16)
Axilla 42 (51)
Axilla plus neck 3 (4)
Groin 23 (28)
Epitrochlear fossa 1 (1)
No. of target lesions on CT
1 66 (80)
≥2 16 (20)
Sum of diameter target lesions, median (IQR), mm 24 (17.25-36.25)
Presurgical treatment regimen
2x I3N1 35 (43)
2x I1N3 25 (30)
2x I3 followed by 2x N3 22 (27)

Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; IxNx, ipilimumab x mg/kg plus nivolumab x mg/kg; KS, Karolinska University Hospital; MIA, Melanoma Institute Australia; NKI, Netherlands Cancer Institute; OpACIN, Study to Identify the Optimal Adjuvant Combination Scheme of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Melanoma Patients; OpACIN-neo, Optimal Neo-Adjuvant Combination Scheme of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab.

a

Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.