Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 18;2020(12):CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub5

1. Results of stratified analyses on symptomatic venous thromboembolism for LMWH versus no thromboprophylaxis.

Variable No of trials No of participants(LMWH) No of participants(control) RR (95% CI) Heterogeneity
I2 statistic/Tau2
P for interaction
All trials 11 2168 1763 0.62 (0.46 to 0.83) 0.0/0.00
Type of LMWH 0.530
Dalteparin 6 508 491 0.66 (0.40 to 1.07) 0.0/0.00
Certoparin 1 442 441 0.57 (0.24 to 1.35) NA
Nadroparin 1 769 381 0.50 (0.22 to 1.13) NA
Enoxaparin 1 160 152 0.43 (0.21 to 0.88) NA
Bemiparin 1 20 18 0.10 (0.01 to 1.75) NA
Tinzaparin 1 269 280 0.94 (0.51 to 1.73) NA
Type of dosage 0.965
Prophylactic 8 1680 1271 0.62 (0.42 to 0.93) 0.0/0.00
Higher than prophylactic 3 488 492 0.58 (0.32 to 1.05) 44.2/0.12
Treatment duration 0.646
< 12 weeks 3 378 388 0.74 (0.42 to 1.31) 8.7/0.03
12–24 weeks 3 879 493 0.56 (0.29 to 1.11) 0.0/0.00
> 24 weeks 5 911 882 0.56 (0.37 to 0.85) 0.0/0.00
Type of cancera 0.683
Mixed 4 878 603 0.74 (0.36 to 1.49) 0.0/0.00
Lung 5 798 684 0.62 (0.38 to 1.02) 6.9/0.03
Pancreatic 2 219 212 0.41 (0.23 to 0.75) 0.0/0.00
Glioma 1 99 87 0.74 (0.35 to 1.57) NA
Breast cancer 1 174 177 0.76 (0.17 to 3.36) NA
Presence of metastatic diseaseb 0.237
Yes, mixed population 5 519 508 0.50 (0.30 to 0.82) 0.0/0.00
No 2 289 298 0.48 (0.07 to 3.56) 55.4/1.38
Allocation concealment 0.935
Adequate 8 1634 1232 0.62 (0.45 to 0.85) 0.0/0.00
Inadequate or unclear 3 534 531 0.60 (0.28 to 1.28) 0.0/0.00
Blinding of participants 0.975
Double‐blind 4 1500 1093 0.62 (0.40 to 0.96) 0.0/0.00
Inadequate or unclear blinding 7 668 670 0.62 (0.42 to 0.91) 0.0/0.00
Intention‐to‐treat analysis 0.317
Yes 5 388 365 0.51 (0.33 to 0.81) 0.0/0.00
No or unclear 6 1780 1398 0.71 (0.48 to 1.04) 0.0/0.00
Selective outcome reporting 0.655
Adequate 9 1909 1524 0.65 (0.46 to 0.92) 0.0/0.00
Incomplete or unclear 2 259 239 0.56 (0.33 to 0.95) 5.6/0.01

CI: confidence interval; LMWH: low‐molecular‐weight heparin; NA: not applicable, only one trial contributing to this stratum; RR: risk ratio.
Analyses performed in STATA.
aHaas 2012 contributed to both the breast cancer and lung cancer strata; Agnelli 2009 contributed both to the lung cancer and mixed cancer strata
bStudies that did not report the selection criteria for metastatic disease were omitted from this analyses (Agnelli 2009; Haas 2012; Khorana 2017; Perry 2010).