Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 18;2020(12):CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub5

Comparison 11. Anticoagulants versus control: symptomatic arterial thromboembolism.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
11.1 Symptomatic arterial thromboembolism: DOAC vs placebo 1 841 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.17, 1.94]
11.2 Symptomatic arterial thromboembolism: LMWH vs no thromboprophylaxis 5 4351 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.49, 1.22]
11.2.1 Dalteparin 2 2321 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.52, 1.53]
11.2.2 Nadroparin 2 1653 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.14, 1.03]
11.2.3 Enoxaparin 1 377 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.54 [0.26, 9.11]
11.3 Symptomatic arterial thromboembolism: LMWH vs aspirin 2 781 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.01 [0.37, 10.86]
11.4 Symptomatic arterial thromboembolism: LMWH vs warfarin 1 439 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 9.04 [0.49, 166.92]
11.5 Symptomatic arterial thromboembolism: vitamin K antagonists vs placebo 1 311 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Not estimable
11.6 Symptomatic arterial thromboembolism: warfarin vs aspirin 1 440 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.01, 4.14]