Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD004554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004554.pub2

Dupont TIPSII 1997.

Methods Randomised double‐blind parallel group study. Randomised by computer generated random number tables with the participants being double‐blinded and the code not being broken until after the database was closed. 
 Multi‐centred ‐ 15 centres in 7 countries. 
 Intention‐to‐treat data analysis. 
 Duration: 6 week parallel group design followed by 3 weeks where the tolcapone groups were crossed over for exploratory purposes.
Participants 97 patients, 12 patients withdrew, 6 for adverse events (three in each of the tolcapone groups), the remainder withdrew for other reasons (2 from placebo, 1 in the 200 mg group, 3 in the 400 mg group). 
 62 men. Mean age 66 years, mean H&Y 'on' 2.2, 'off' 2.5, Mean levodopa dose 662 mg/day. 
 Inclusion criteria: Patients with moderately advanced PD whose wearing‐off of levodopa effects had been successfully controlled by relatively frequent dosage.
Interventions Patients received 200 mg tid tolcapone (n=32), 400 mg tid tolcapone (n=32) or placebo (n=33). Riboflavin (0.5 mg) was included in the placebo tablets to mimic the yellow discolouration in urine that occurs with tolcapone as a harmless side‐effect. 
 Selegiline and apomorphine were not permitted. Concomitant use of other types of antiparkinsonian medications was allowed if the dosage regime had been stable for 2 months before study entry and remained unchanged throughout the study. Nonselective MAOI's were prohibited during the study. High protein‐binding drugs were avoided.
Outcomes Levodopa dose 
 Number of doses 
 IGA motor signs severity 
 UPDRS motor 
 UPDRS ADL (on) 
 UPDRS mood 
 Adverse events
Notes TOLCAPONE 
 Cross‐over 200‐400 mg ‐ weeks 6‐9.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate