Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 29;4:ojab050. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojab050

Table 1.

Comparison of 3-Dimensional (3D) Modeling Systems

Device Size Advantages Disadvantages
3D Vectra XT 42 cm (H) by 183 cm (W) Validated through multiple studies
Facial skin analysis software
Tools available for longitudinal outcome tracking
Large device size
Single static 3D model without augmentation
Vectra H2 32 cm (H) by 18 cm (W) Portability
Ease of use
Intellistage features allow for 360-degree imaging
Facial skin analysis software
Tools available for longitudinal outcome tracking
Fewer studies validating use
Single static 3D model without augmentation
Crisalix VR 4D Portable device add-on Augmented reality offers novel patient perspective
Variety of cosmetic surgical outcomes modeled
Basic skin analysis software
Utility limited to preoperative modeling
ILLUSIO Pro Portable device add-on Augmented reality offers novel patient perspective
Ease of use
Requires only portable device and software
Basic skin analysis software
Outcome modeling focused only on breast
Utility limited to preoperative modeling

3D, three-dimensional; 4D, four-dimensional; H, height; W, width.