Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Lipidol. 2019 Feb 14;13(3):425–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.02.002

Table 2.

Clinical, laboratory, and histology data of patients who had undergone a diagnostic liver biopsy (histology cohort, n = 222) grouped according to low-density lipoprotein levels

Variables LDL < 50 mg/dL LDL 51–130 mg/dL LDL>130 mg/dL P value
N (% of total) 14 (6%) 171 (77%) 37 (17%) N/A
Clinical data
 Age (y)  12 ± 3  13 ± 3  14 ± 3  .25
 Sex, N (%male) 7, 50% 115, 67% 24, 65%  .45
 Ethnicity
  N (%) Hispanic 3 (21%) 40 (23%) 3 (8%)  .12
  N (%) Non-Hispanic 11 (79%) 131 (77%) 34 (92%)
 BMI (kg/m2) 32.1 ± 5.1 35.5 ± 7.5 37.3 ± 6.9  .05
Laboratory values
 ALT (U/L)   91 ± 47   96 ± 70 110 ± 64  .22
 AST (U/L)   52 ± 24   55 ± 35   64 ± 35  .17
 GGT (U/L)   55 ± 22   54 ± 56   81 ± 88   <.01
 ALP (U/L) 207 ± 66 213 ± 110 195 ± 117  .45
 HbA1c%  5.1 ± 0.4  5.3 ± 0.7  5.4 ± .1.0  .81
Histology data
 Steatosis  2.4 ± 0.9  1.8 ± 1.0  2.0 ± 0.9  .06
 Lobular inflammation  1.3 ± 0.6  1.2 ± 0.7  1.0 ± 0.7  .38
 Portal inflammation  0.8 ± 0.6  0.8 ± 0.6  0.8 ± 0.6  .88
 NAFLD activity score  4.5 ± 1.3  3.7 ± 1.6  3.7 ± 1.6  .14
 Fibrosis score  1.0 ± 1.1  0.8 ± 1.0  0.8 ± 0.9  .80

The results are shown as means ± standard deviation, unless otherwise indicated.