Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 23.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jan 23;46(1):100–113. doi: 10.1111/acer.14739

Table 3.

Intercorrelations of TAC features and drinking self-reports

Within persons (N days = 1274) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

 1. AUC 1
 2. Peak 0.92 1
 3. Rise Rate 0.69 0.82 1
 4. Fall Rate 0.64 0.78 0.82 1
 5. Duration 0.64 0.69 0.57 0.55 1
 6. Morning Report Drinks 0.73 0.74 0.65 0.60 0.60 1
 7. Episodic EMA Drinks 0.50 0.45 0.35 0.34 0.30 0.57 1
Between persons (N persons = 218) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

 1. AUC 1
 2. Peak 0.95 1
 3. Rise Rate 0.76 0.85 1
 4. Fall Rate 0.74 0.83 0.87 1
 5. Duration 0.84 0.84 0.71 0.65 1
 6. Morning Report Drinks 0.74 0.73 0.63 0.63 0.65 1
 7. Episodic EMA Drinks 0.46 0.49 0.45 0.38 0.43 0.52 1

Note: Within-persons correlations were estimated and tested for significance using multilevel models with person-mean centered features. Person-mean centered features were standardized prior to running models to obtain correlation coefficients. At the between-persons level, standard Pearson correlations between person-means were tested among the 218 participants for whom TAC data were collected. All correlations presented were significant at p < 0.001. Episodic EMA Drink reports were only present on 536 days among 204 participants.