Telehealth has long been considered a promising option to advance access to specialized services such as voice therapy,1 , 2 , 3 and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has expanded the use of this technology substantially throughout the health care system.4 , 5 Growing experience with remote voice assessment6 and treatment7 suggest that telehealth will remain an important tool, even as in-person interventions resume. Moving forward, the health equity implications of telehealth practice require consideration. The authors aim to describe how the remote delivery of voice therapy is uniquely situated to promote healthcare equity for Transgender and Nonbinary (TGNB) individuals.
TGNB people have historically been marginalized in society,8 a problem which has been exacerbated by the social and economic upheaval of the COVID-19 pandemic. A 2020 survey identified that more than 50% of self-identified TNBG respondents were at a high-risk of developing COVID-19 and had restricted access to gender-affirming healthcare services.9 Telehealth is poised to address limitations in health care access for TGNB individuals as it has already been implemented in other fields, including surgery and behavioral health.10 , 11 Prior to the pandemic, access to voice therapy for TGNB people represented an important gap in care. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) has identified gender-affirming voice training as a necessity for many TGNB individuals.12 However, in the largest survey of transgender people to date, 46% of transfeminine respondents indicated that they have not yet received behavioral voice therapy but wanted to pursue that option.8 Given that TGNB people may make up as much as 2% of the population,13 this represents a significant unmet need.
TGNB people living in rural environments are particularly vulnerable to healthcare access limitations. Currently, one in four (27%) TGNB people living in rural locations travel more than 75 miles to access gender affirming medical care.14 While this travel distance may be feasible for other gender-affirming healthcare needs that require intermittent medical visits (ie, hormone replacement therapy), long travel times are likely to prevent access to voice therapy altogether. In order to be maximally effective, voice therapy requires frequent sessions, creating a barrier to care access for individuals who live a long distance from a qualified practitioner. The costs incurred for traveling long distances include lost wages, lodging and fuel, and diminished safety being in an unfamiliar community. The use of telehealth technologies such as those presented by Schneider et al.6 (ie, remote voice recording) hold important promise for addressing these barriers to voice therapy access.
While geographic barriers are considered frequently for use of telehealth, TGNB people also face unique social barriers to healthcare access. Due to a long history of marginalization by healthcare systems, as well as the rigid gender categorization which frequently accompany them, many TGNB distrust healthcare spaces.15 , 16 Telehealth provides an important opportunity for individuals to engage with voice therapy in a more comfortable environment. It also may empower TGNB individuals to participate in a client-centered approach to care that is often lacking in many spaces.17 Many TGNB people experience social anxiety as a result of harassment and mistreatment in public spaces due to their gender identity.8 This means that actions that many cisgender people might find routine, such as checking in to an appointment, can be sources of substantial stress for TGNB people.18 Gender affirming voice therapy can play an important role in alleviating some of this stress by modifying both gender attribution and self-perceived femininity.19 , 20 However, this benefit cannot be realized if patients do not have access to care. Telehealth presents an important opportunity for TGNB people to engage more comfortably with this care. Telehealth voice therapy for TGNB individuals may help to reduce gender misattribution in public, and therefore increase trust in accessing future healthcare which requires in-person intervention.
Telehealth also may be a uniquely successful intervention for many transfeminine patients. For instance, one common metric used to identify the success of both voice therapy and voice surgery for transfeminine patients is whether patients are perceived correctly as women while speaking on the telephone.21 The telehealth format provides an opportunity to simulate that scenario. That has the potential to give the therapist and patient a more realistic view of how the TGNB individual may be perceived in daily life when communicating in a virtual format or over the phone. TGNB patients also are likely to have the technology necessary to obtain good recordings as there are high rates of internet and video game use in this population.22 Many TGNB individuals have access to head-mounted microphones and internet at home that would further support the use of a virtual platform. In Schneider et al., the authors sought to validate the use of less accurate recording technology, such as cell phone microphones, in the capture of voice samples for analysis.6 They note that a head-mounted microphone positioned at 45-90 degrees away from the mouth is the gold standard for recording voice outcomes.6
While telehealth has long been considered a promising option to advance access to specialized services in many fields, ie, gender affirmation care,22 , 23 voice therapy, etc., in our opinion, the remote delivery of voice therapy is uniquely situated to promote healthcare equity for TGNB patients. Further study and implementation of virtual recording technology for voice therapy in the TGNB populations may address not only existing health disparities, but also may offer important additional information on the overall implications of telehealth in the field of voice.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: None.
References
- 1.Mashima PA, Birkmire-Peters DP, Syms MJ, et al. Telehealth: voice therapy using telecommunications technology. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;12:432–439. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/089). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rangarathnam B, McCullough GH, Pickett H, et al. Telepractice versus in-person delivery of voice therapy for primary muscle tension dysphonia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24:386–399. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0017. PMID: 25836732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quinn R, Park S, Theodoros D, et al. Delivering group speech maintenance therapy via telerehabilitation to people with Parkinson's disease: A pilot study. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21:385–394. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1476918. Epub 2018 Jun 7. PMID: 29879854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, et al. Use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e24087. doi: 10.2196/24087. Published 2020 Dec 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strohl MP, Dwyer CD, Ma Y, et al. Implementation of telemedicine in a laryngology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned, experiences shared [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 23] J Voice. 2020;20 doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.017. S0892-199730234-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schneider SL, Habich L, Weston ZM, et al. Observations and considerations for implementing remote acoustic voice recording and analysis in clinical practice [published online ahead of print, 2021 Aug 5] J Voice. 2021;21 doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.011. S0892-199700196-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alegria R, Vaz Freitas S, Manso MC. Effectiveness of voice therapy in patients with vocal fold nodules: a systematic search and narrative review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277:2951–2966. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06059-8. Epub 2020 May 22. PMID: 32444967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.James S.E., Herman J.L., Rankin S., et al. National Center for Transgender Equality; Washington, DC: 2016. The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Koehler A, Motmans J, Leo Mulio A, et al. [published online ahead of print, 2021 Oct 18]. Int J Transgend Health. 2021
- 10.Pankey TL, Heredia D, Jr, Vencill JA, et al. Gender-affirming telepsychology during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations for adult transgender and gender diverse populations. J Health Serv Psychol. 2021:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s42843-021-00048-z]. [published online ahead of print, 2021 Oct 16] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Asaad M, Rajesh A, Vyas K, et al. Telemedicine in transgender care: a twenty-first-century beckoning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146:108e–109e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer M, et al. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people version 7. Int J Transgenderism. 2012;13:165–232. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goodman M, Adams N, Corneil T, et al. Size and distribution of transgender and gender nonconforming populations: a narrative review. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2019;48:303–321. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Movement Advancement Project. 2019. Where We Call Home: Transgender People in Rural America. Available at: www.lgbtmap.org/rural-trans.
- 15.Henriquez NR, Ahmad N. The Message Is You Don't Exist": Exploring Lived Experiences of Rural Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) People Utilizing Health care Services. SAGE Open Nurs. 2021;7:23779608211051174. doi: 10.1177/23779608211051174. PMID: 34869861; PMCID: PMC8642108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Medina-Martínez J, Saus-Ortega C, Sánchez-Lorente MM, et al. Health inequities in LGBT people and nursing interventions to reduce them: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:11801. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211801. PMID: 34831556; PMCID: PMC8624572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vermeir E, Jackson LA, Marshall EG. Barriers to primary and emergency healthcare for trans adults. Culture Health Sexuality. 2018;20:232–246. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1338757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Azul D, Hancock AB. Who or what has the capacity to influence voice production? Development of a transdisciplinary theoretical approach to clinical practice addressing voice and the communication of speaker socio-cultural positioning. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;22:559–570. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1709544. Epub 2020 Feb 16. PMID: 32063069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gelfer MP, Tice RM. Perceptual and acoustic outcomes of voice therapy for male-to-female transgender individuals immediately after therapy and 15 months later. J Voice. 2013;27:335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carew L, Dacakis G, Oates J. The effectiveness of oral resonance therapy on the perception of femininity of voice in male-to-female transsexuals. J Voice. 2007;21:591–603. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dacakis G, Davies S, Oates JM, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of the transsexual voice questionnaire for male-to-female transsexuals. J Voice. 2013;27:312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arcelus J, Bouman WP, Jones BA, et al. Video gaming and gaming addiction in transgender people: an exploratory study. J Behav Addict. 2017;6:21–29. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stoehr SR, Hamidian Jahromi A, Hunter EL, et al. Telemedicine for gender-affirming medical and surgical care: a systematic review and call-to-action. Transgender Health. 2021 doi: 10.1089/trgh.2020.0136. [published online ahead of print:5 Jul 2021] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]