Table 2.
Comparison of the groups in terms of the PIU score (continuous variable)
| Variables | df | χ2 and Z scores | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sexa | z = –2.52a | < 0.05 | |
| Study mode (full time/extramural)a | z = –2.98a | < 0.01 | |
| Study cycle (bachelor, master, uniform)b | 2 | χ2 = 8.65b | < 0.05 |
| Year of studiesb | 3 | χ2 = 4.09b | NSf |
| Field of studiesb | 9 | χ2 = 32.44b | < 0.001 |
| Preferred device (computer/smartphone/computer and smartphone comparably)b | 2 | χ2 = 11.34b | < 0.01 |
| Purpose of Internet useb | 5 | χ2 = 29.35b | < 0.001 |
| Severity of IZZb, c | 2 | χ2 = 7.26b | < 0.05 |
| BDI risk categorya, d | z = –5.01a | < 0.001 | |
| EAT risk categorya, e | z = –1.17a | NS |
aMann–Whitney U test
bKruskal–Wallis test
cIZZ severity—groups of low, medium and high frequency of health-related behaviors
dBDI risk category—comparison of groups which meet and do not meet diagnostic criteria for a depressive episode
eEAT risk category—comparison of groups which meet and do not meet diagnostic criteria for eating disorders
fnot statistically significant