Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 28;163(3):e432–e452. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002422

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Parvalbumin-expressing interneuron (PVIN)-mediated input to lamina I projection neurons. (A) Low-magnification image (upper) shows a transverse spinal cord slice with recording pipette in place to record from a lamina I projection neuron (PN), with higher-magnification images showing the targeted recording configuration between the recording electrode and retrogradely labelled PN (brightfield left, mCherry fluorescence centre, and overlay right). (B) Photostimulation responses recorded in PNs showing characteristics of monosynaptic inhibitory (upper) and excitatory (lower) connections. Overlayed traces (gray) show 10 photostimulation (blue) trials on an expanded times scale with averaged responses (black) superimposed. Schematics (left) summarise the postulated underlying circuits between PVINs (green) and PNs (red). (C) Photostimulation responses recorded in PNs showing characteristics of polysynaptic connections. Overlayed traces (gray) show 10 photostimulation (blue) trials on an expanded times scale with averaged responses (black) superimposed. Schematics (left) summarise the postulated underlying circuits between PVINs (green) and PNs (red). Polysynaptic responses could be further differentiated into those that arose from excitatory circuits evoked by photostimulation of ePVINs (upper) and those that arose from photostimulation of iPVINs causing primary afferent depolarisation (PAD) and subsequent excitatory signalling from these terminals (lower). (D) Group data plots compare latency and jitter of photostimulation responses in monosynaptic excitatory, polysynaptic excitatory, and monosynaptic inhibitory connections. Scale bars in A (μm) = 100 upper; 40 lower. ePVIN, excitatory parvalbumin-expressing interneuron; iPVIN, inhibitory parvalbumin-expressing interneuron.