Skip to main content
. 2001 Sep;39(9):3260–3266. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3260-3266.2001

TABLE 1.

RFLP patterns and clinical and mycological status of T. rubrum and T. mentagrophytes strains from 20 onychomycosis patients

Patient and time No. of samples Toenail sampleda Microscopyb % of area involvedc RFLP typed
Patients with T. rubrum infection
 Patient 1
  Aug. 97e R3 Pos. 100 Tr-1
  Sept. 97e Pos. 60 Tr-1
  Nov. 97 Pos. 40 Tr-1
  Dec. 97 Pos. 20 Tr-1
  Jan. 98 Pos. 5 Tr-1
  June 98e 6 Neg. 0 Tr-1
 Patient 2
  May 97e R1 Pos. 40 Tr-2
  Jun. 97e Pos. 30 Tr-2
  Sept. 97 Neg. 20 Tr-2
  Nov. 97e Pos. 20 Tr-2
  Feb. 98 5 Pos. 15 Tr-2
 Patient 3
  Nov. 97e R1 Pos. 70 Tr-3
  Dec. 97e L1 Pos. 70 Tr-4
  Jan. 98e R1 Pos. 60 Tr-4
  Mar. 98 4 Pos. 50 Tr-3
 Patient 4
  Dec. 96e L1 Pos. 50 Tr-5
  Sept. 97e Pos. 20 Tr-3
  Nov. 97e Neg. 7.5 Tr-3
  Dec. 97 Pos. 7.5 Tr-5
  Mar. 98e 5 Neg. 7.5 Tr-5
 Patient 5
  Dec. 96 R1 Pos. 80 Tr-1
  July 97e L1 Pos. 60 Tr-2
  Aug. 97 Pos. 50 Tr-1
  Nov. 97 Pos. 10 Tr-2
  Feb. 98 5 Pos. 0 Tr-2
 Patient 6
  Sept. 97e R1 Pos. 70 Tr-3
  Oct. 97e L1 Neg. 70 Tr-3
  Dec. 97 Pos. 50 Tr-3
  Jan. 98 Pos. 50 Tr-3
  Dec. 98 Pos. 10 Tr-3
  Apr. 99 6 Neg. 7.5 Tr-5
 Patient 7
  Nov. 97e R1 Pos. 70 Tr-1
  Feb. 98 Pos. 60 Tr-1
  Apr. 98e Pos. 55 Tr-1
  May 98e Pos. 55 Tr-1
  Dec. 98 5 Pos. 10 Tr-1
 Patient 8
  July 97e L1 Pos. 70 Tr-1
  Aug. 97 Pos. 60 Tr-1
  Sept. 97 Pos. 50 Tr-1
  Jan. 98 Pos. 50 Tr-1
  Apr. 98e Pos. 50 Tr-1
  July 98 6 Neg. 7.5 Tr-1
 Patient 9
  Jan. 98e L1 Pos. 95 Tr-4
  Feb. 98e Pos. 95 Tr-3
  Mar. 98e Pos. 90 Tr-3
  Apr. 98 4 Pos. 80 Tr-3
 Patient 10
  July 97e R1 Pos. 40 Tr-3
  Aug. 97e Pos. 40 Tr-3
  Oct. 97 3 Pos. 20 Tr-3
 Patient 11
  May 97e R1 Pos. 30 Tr-3
  Sept. 97e Pos. 80 Tr-3
  Jan. 98 3 Pos. 70 Tr-3
 Patient 12
  Aug. 97e L3 Pos. 80 Tr-5
  Sept. 97e Pos. 60 Tr-5
  Oct. 97 3 Pos. 20 Tr-5
 Patient 13
  July 97e R1 Pos. 90 Tr-3
  Dec. 97 2 Neg. 40 Tr-3
 Patient 14
  Jan. 97 L1 Pos. 100 Tr-3
  Apr. 97e 2 R1 Pos. 80 Tr-3
 Patient 15
  Mar. 97 L1 Pos. 100 Tr-2
  Apr. 97e R1 Pos. 100 Tr-2
  Dec. 97 3 Neg. 0 Tr-5
 Patient 16
  May 98e R1 Pos. 70 Tr-3
  June 98e Pos. 60 Tr-3
  July 98e 4 Pos. 60 Tr-3
  Aug 98 Neg. 50 Tr-3
Patients with T. mentagrophytes infection
 Patient 1
  June 97e L1 Pos. 85 Tm-1
  Aug. 97 Pos. 50 Tm-1
  Sept. 97 3 Pos. 50 Tm-1
 Patient 2
  Sept. 97e L1 Pos. 20 Tm-1
  Nov. 97 Pos. 20 Tm-1
  Dec. 97 3 Pos. 20 Tm-1
 Patient 3
  Aug. 97e L1 Pos. 60 Tm-2
  Sept. 97 Pos. 55 Tm-2
  Nov. 97 3 Pos. 55 Tm-2
 Patient 4
  July 97e L1 Pos. 90 Tm-1
  Aug. 97 2 Pos. 80 Tm-1
a

Infected toenails were collected from either the right (R) or the left (L) toes. 

b

Result of microscopic examination of the clinical material; Pos. represents the presence of fungal filaments, and Neg. represents no fungal filaments in the specimen under the microscope. All specimens were culture positive for T. mentagrophytes

c

The percentage of the nail infected was estimated visually. 

d

RFLP pattern observed by hybridization of the PCR-amplified ITS region used as a probe against EcoRI-digested total genomic DNA. Tr, T. rubrum RFLP type; Tm, T. mentagrophytes RFLP type. 

e

Time period when the patient was under treatment. The two oral antifungals used for treatment were itraconazole and terbinafine. Time periods not marked represent follow-up examinations.