Table 7.

Performance analysis alongside similar DLM techniques (N.R = Not reported)

Method	Remarks		Performance
			Accuracy (%)	Specificity (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Testing time (s)
(Jain et al., 2020)	2 class		76.0	81.1	61.5	N.R
(Marques et al., 2020)	2 class		98.1	N.R	N.R	N.R
	3 class		87.0	N.R	N.R	N.R
(Ucar and Korkmaz, 2019)	ResNet		99.5	100	99.0	N.R
	Xception		99.0	98.0	100	N.R
(Zabirul et al., 2020)	3 class		98.9	98.9	98.6	N.R
(Sedik et al., 2020)	2 class		99.6	N.R	N.R	N.R
	3 class		98.7	N.R	N.R	N.R
(Altan and Karasu, 2020)	3 class		98.3	99.1	99.2	N.R
(Pathak et al., 2020)	3 class		99.4	99.3	98.7	113.0
(Das et al., 2020)	2 class	CNN	99.0	100	98.6	2.6
		ConvLSTM	96.0	100	99.0	5.2
Proposed	2 class	CNN	99.2	100	100	2.5
		ConvLSTM	98.0	97.0	99.0	7.3
	3 class	CNN	98.2	99.2	97.2	5.7
		ConvLSTM	96.8	99.6	94	4.3