Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;106(2):601–606. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0802

Table 2.

Confirmed and probable ZIKV infection among patients in the Kudat district in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, in 2017–2018

IgM FRNT90
Sample ID ZIKV DENV JEV ZIKV IgG titer ZIKV JEV DENV-1 DENV-2 DENV-3 DENV-4 Diagnostic interpretation*
P-6 35.7 9.5 2.5 51,855 1,280 80 320 160 80 40 ZIKV
P-26 12.3 3.0 0.4 20,907 1,280 < 20 < 20 160 160 320 ZIKV
P-33 2.5 0.9 0.3 13,907 320 40 < 20 40 80 < 20 ZIKV
P-45 24.5 7.3 1.3 69,577 2,560 160 320 320 160 80 ZIKV
P-46 22.0 4.6 0.5 27,150 2,560 < 20 640 320 160 80 ZIKV
P-50 58.1 0.2 0.8 7,632 1,280 44 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 ZIKV
P-104 29.4 13.8 0.5 45,758 2,560 320 640 640 320 40 ZIKV
P-106 3.3 2.0 0.5 48,589 1,280 < 20 < 20 160 80 80 ZIKV
P-118 9.9 1.2 0.8 56,103 2,560 40 < 20 320 80 80 ZIKV
P-119 17.0 1.7 4.1 62,311 2,560 80 < 20 80 80 40 ZIKV
P-120 4.3 1.7 0.8 28,058 320 40 < 20 80 < 20 80 ZIKV
P-127 2.4 1.4 0.4 35,568 1,280 40 40 80 40 40 ZIKV
P-192 29.0 1.1 0.6 26,278 1,280 < 20 320 80 40 80 ZIKV
P-207 39.2 0.7 0.8 32,582 1,280 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 ZIKV
P-212 6.3 1.7 0.7 10,816 160 < 20 < 20 40 40 < 20 ZIKV
P-253 5.3 0.8 0.3 4,882 160 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 ZIKV
P-258 17.0 2.5 0.3 47,425 2,560 < 20 640 160 80 80 ZIKV
P-262 15.0 4.0 0.2 39,926 640 160 640 320 80 40 probable
P-267 53.6 7.7 0.9 42,717 640 160 < 20 160 80 < 20 ZIKV
P-288 9.1 3.6 0.1 21,995 320 < 20 < 20 80 < 20 < 20 ZIKV
P-310 28.4 2.4 0.6 29,556 320 < 20 80 40 < 20 < 20 ZIKV
P-319 48.9 12.0 4.3 60,178 1,280 40 320 640 160 80 probable
P-333 15.8 2.7 0.3 42,188 320 < 20 40 80 < 20 40 ZIKV
P-359 10.3 4.4 0.1 22,361 640 < 20 40 160 80 80 ZIKV
P-376 20.7 7.1 0.3 50,517 5,120 < 20 160 320 320 160 ZIKV
P-398 12.1 1.9 0.3 6,880 640 < 20 160 < 20 < 20 < 20 ZIKV

DENV-1-4 = dengue virus serotype 1–4; Diagnosis interpretation* = ZIKV (confirmed ZIKV infection), Probable (probable ZIKV infection). Bold font indicates highest IgM and neutralization value in Table.