Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;12:738211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738211

Table 2.

Study quality assessment for eligible randomized controlled trials.

References Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Item 8 Item 9 Score
Mitchell et al. (2014) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 6
Jindani et al. (2015) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 5
Seppälä et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8
Quiñones et al. (2015) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Reinhardt et al. (2017) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 5
Huberty et al. (2020) 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Goldsteina et al. (2017) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 6
van der Kolk et al. (2014) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 6
Dick et al. (2014) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 5
Kim et al. (2013) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 6
Omidi et al. (2013) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Carter et al. (2013) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8
Possemato et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 7
Kearney et al. (2013) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Polusny et al. (2015) 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Kelly and Garland (2016) 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 6

Item 1 = randomization; Item 2 = concealed allocation; Item 3 = similar baseline; Item 4 = blinding of assessors; Item 5 = ≤ 15% dropouts; Item 6 = intention-to-treat analysis; Item 7 = between-group comparison; Item 8 = point measure and measures of variability; Item 9 = isolate exercise intervention; 1 = explicitly described and present in details; 0 = absent, inadequately described, or unclear.