Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 11.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2018 Nov 27;138(22):2469–2481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036063

Table 1.

Associations between genetically predicted and measured levels of a protein and LDL cholesterol levels.

Protein CIS* Odds-ratio 95% CI p-value Beta 95% CI p-value
ApoE Y 1.07 (1.04–1.11) 6.2×10−6 0.43 (0.36 – 0.50) 4.9 ×10−30
ApoE2 Y 1.10 (1.07–1.14) 4.1×10−10 0.21 (0.14 – 0.29) 1.2 ×10−7
ApoE3 Y 1.12 (1.08–1.15) 4.5×10−12 0.37 (0.30 – 0.45) 7.0 ×10−22
ApoE4 Y 1.07 (1.04–1.11) 5.7×10−6 0.29 (0.21 – 0.36) 6.6 ×10−13
Catalase N 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 1.1×10−5 0.05 (−0.03 – 0.13) 0.26
Granulin N 1.09 (1.06–1.13) 1.0×10−8 −0.02 (−0.10 – 0.06) 0.66
IL-27 N 1.07 (1.03–1.10) 3.6×10−5 0.00 (−0.07 – 0.08) 0.90

Footnotes:

*

Indicates whether the association was significant (p<0.01) when analyses were limited to SNPs located within 1 Mb of the gene locus.

EHR genetic association based on logistic regression analyses for an association with a diagnosis of “Hyperlipidemia” (n=8,511 cases and 13,436 controls) adjusting for birth year, gender, eMERGE site, genotyping platform and 3 principal components.

MDCS epidemiological validation showing the change in LDL-C levels based on a linear regression model adjusting for age, sex and plate.