Table 3.
Effects of targeted payment reforms on the quality of care outcomes.
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STUDY | PAYMENT MODEL | DISEASE-RELATED EXAMINATION(S)/TREATMENT(S) | APPROPRIATE DRUG USE | MORTALITY | HOSPITAL READMISSIONS | RISK OF BIAS | |
| |||||||
AC | DR | ||||||
| |||||||
Bhatt, S.P. | Bundle | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | None | None | Critical |
| |||||||
Koehler, B.E. | Bundle | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | Mixed | n.a. | Some concerns |
| |||||||
Morton, K. | Bundle | n.a. | n.a. | None | None | None | Moderate |
| |||||||
Parekh, T.M. | Bundle | n.a. | n.a. | Decrease | None | n.a. | Serious |
| |||||||
Pawaskar, M. | Capitation | n.a. | Decrease | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | Serious |
| |||||||
Quinn, A.E. | Capitation | None | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | Moderate |
| |||||||
Joynt Maddox, K.E. | DRG | n.a. | n.a. | None | None | n.a. | Serious |
| |||||||
Kutz, A. | DRG | n.a. | n.a. | None | None | n.a. | Moderate |
| |||||||
Lichkus, J. | DRG*1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | None | n.a. | Critical |
| |||||||
Maughhan, B.C. | DRG | n.a. | n.a. | None | None | n.a. | Moderate |
| |||||||
Salzberg, C.A. | Global budget *1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | None | n.a. | Moderate |
| |||||||
Cross, D.A. | P4P | Increase | Increase | n.a. | Decrease | n.a. | Moderate |
| |||||||
Hollander, M.J. | P4P | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | None | n.a. | Serious |
|
AC: All-cause, DR: Disease-related, n.a. Not applicable.
*1 Payment reform is accompanied by an organisational reform.
Increase’ or ‘decrease’ signifies that the study found a significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect in all outcomes related to a specific outcome domain. ‘Mixed’ was used for studies with varying outcomes within one domain. ‘None’ was used for studies that found no statistically significant effect (p ≤ 0.05) for any of the outcomes related to a specific outcome domain or that studies did not report on any significance.