Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 20;23(2):e13484. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13484

TABLE 6.

Comparison of the incidence (in %) with different levels of “volume of regret” (VoR) between MI and SI plans

VoR
≤ 2% 2%–5% 5%–10% ≥10%
MI plan SI plan MI plan SI plan MI plan SI plan MI plan SI plan
Shift Magnitude (%Plan) (%Plan) (%Plan) (%Plan) (%Plan) (%Plan) (%Plan) (%Plan)
Translational +0.5 mm 23.9 34.8 45.7 37.0 28.3 26.1 2.2 2.2
–0.5 mm 21.7 19.6 41.3 34.8 32.6 39.1 4.3 6.5
+1 mm 0 0 17.4 19.6 28.3 30.4 54.3 50.0
–1 mm 0 0 8.7 13.0 26.1 26.1 65.2 60.9
+1.5 mm 0 0 6.5 4.3 17.4 21.7 76.1 73.9
–1.5 mm 0 0 0 0 13.0 15.2 87.0 84.8
+2 mm 0 0 0 0 8.7 8.7 91.3 91.3
–2 mm 0 0 0 0 2.2 0 97.8 100.0
Rotational +0.5 93.5 69.6 4.3 28.3 2.2 2.2 0 0
–0.5 97.8 82.6 2.2 15.2 0 2.2 0 0
+1.0 89.1 45.7 10.9 30.4 0 17.4 0 6.5
–1.0 100.0 52.2 0 26.1 0 15.2 0 6.5
+1.5 95.7 32.6 4.3 23.9 0 21.7 0 21.7
–1.5 100.0 39.1 0 28.3 0 15.2 0 17.4
+2.0 87.0 19.6 13.0 30.4 0 13.0 0 37.0
–2.0 91.3 23.9 8.7 32.6 0 10.9 0 32.6

VoR = % volume of PTV not covered by prescribed isodose.

%Plan = number of plans/total number of plans x 100%.