Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;14(3):575. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030575

Table 2.

Characteristics of the studies evaluating oncological outcomes in patients with tumors < 2 cm.

Author Year N Outcomes
Nam, et al. [95] 2012 526 (335 < 2 cm) No difference between open surgery (OP) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for oncologic outcomes
Paik, et al. [101] 2019 476 (248 < 2 cm) Difference observed: MIS was associated with a lower rate of disease-free survival (DFS)
Kim, et al. [96] 2019 565 (283 < 2 cm) No difference between open surgery (OP) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for oncologic outcomes
Pedone Anchora, et al. [94] 2020 423 (251 < 2 cm) No difference between open surgery (OP) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for oncologic outcomes
Chen, et al. [103] 2020 325 Difference observed: MIS was associated with worse 5-year disease-free survival
Yang, et al. [97] 2020 333 (111 < 2 cm) No difference between open surgery (OP) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for oncologic outcomes
Chiva, et al. [90] 2020 693 (303 < 2 cm) No difference between open surgery (OP) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for oncologic outcomes
Uppal, et al. [99] 2020 815 (264 < 2 cm) Difference observed: MIS was associated with increased risk of recurrence and inferior disease-free survival
Rodriguez, et al. [98] 2021 1379 (979 < 2 cm) No difference between open surgery (OP) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for oncologic outcomes
Nasioudis, et al. [102] 2021 2046 Difference observed: MIS was associated with worse overall survival (OS)