Table 2.
Prognosis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | AI Tools | Ref. | Key Findings | |
Laboratory parameters | k-adaptive partitioning | [54] | AI-supported modified risk staging for multiple myeloma | |
Beta2microglobulin | Infinicyt software | [55] | Next-Generation Flow and ML for highly sensitive detection of minimal residual disease | |
Gene expression profile, ISS stage, first line therapy | Random Forest | [56] | Survival prediction and treatment optimization using ML models based on clinical and gene expression data | |
mRNA expression-based steamness index | One-class logistic regression | [57] | Analysis of gene expression via one-class logistic regression ML identifies stemness features in MM | |
Prediction of Response to Treatment | ||||
Drugs | Parameters | AI tools | Ref. | |
Bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, oprozomib | Gene expression profile | Random Forest | [58] | A gene expression signature distinguishes resistance to proteasome inhibitors |
Proteasome inhibitors | Gene complex | Simulated Treatment learning signature | [59] | Gene networks constructed using simulated treatment learning can predict proteasome inhibitor benefit |
PAD, VCD | Gene evaluation | Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Ridge Regression, Binomial Naïve Bayes, Multi-layer perception | [60] | ML applicability for classification of chemotherapy response using 53 MM RNA-sequencing profiles |
Five first-line treatments (Bor-Cyc-Dex, Bor-Dex, Bor-Len-Dex, Len-Dex, Non-treatment) | Clinical markers, gene evaluation | Multi Learning Training approach | [61] | ML predicts treatment sensitivity in MM based on molecular and clinical information coupled with drug response |
Bor, bortezomib; Cyc, cyclophosphamide; Dex, dexamethasone; Len, lenalidomide.