Table 10.
Author(s) | Cancer Site, n | CT Drug(s) (mg/m2) × Cycles |
Temperature Metrics (°C) |
HT Session |
ttreat
(min) |
Thermal Dose |
tint
(min) |
Sequence | Clinical Outcome (Comment) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yang et al. [140] | Advanced non-small cell lung cancer, n = 48 |
1000 gemcitabine twice weekly × 6 75 cisplatin twice weekly × 6 |
n.r. | Ntotal: 8 Nweek: 2 |
40–60 | n.r. | n.r. | HT after CT or HT before CT |
|
Tschoep-Lechner et al. [141] | Advanced pancreatic cancer, n = 23 |
1000 gemcitabine once weekly × 8 25 cisplatin twice weekly × 8 |
Tmax
†: 42.1 (40.9–44.1) |
Nweek: 2 Ntotal ‡: 8 |
60 | n.r. | 0 | simultaneously |
|
Stahl et al. [137] | Soft tissue sarcomas, n = 46 |
250 etoposide × 4 6000 ifosfamide × 4 50 adriamycin × 4 |
T90
†: 39.90 ± 0.74 (good responders) and T90 †: 39.42 ± 1.78 (bad responders) |
Nweek: 2 Ntotal ‡: 8 |
60 | CEM43°CT90†: 17.96 ± 7.16 (good responders) CEM43°CT90†: 11.07 ± 5.58 (good responders) |
0 | simultaneously |
|
n: number of patients assigned to be treated with HT in combination withCT; †: mean value (±standard deviation) or mean value (range); ‡: median (range); 1 CR: complete response; 2 PR: partial response; 3 SD: stable disease; 4 PD: progression disease; 5 ORR: objective response rate; 6 DCR: disease control rate; 7 OS: overall survival; 8 RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; 9 WHO: world health organization.