Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 4;14(3):801. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030801

Table 1.

A summary of key prospective and retrospective studies evaluating sequencing of abiraterone and enzalutamide in mCRPC.

Study Study Type Sequence (n) Median PFS Median PSA-PFS ** Median OS
Khalaf
et al. [10]
Prospective,
randomized
AAP → ENZ (101) - 19·3 months
(95% CI 16·0–30·5)
28.8 months
(95% CI 25.4–NR)
ENZ → AAP (101) - 15.2 months
(95% CI 11.9–19.8)
(p = 0.036)
24.7 months
(95% CI 18.8–34.0)
(p = 0.23)
Terada
et al. [11] ##
Retrospective AAP → ENZ (113) - 15.0 months
(95% CI 12.6–16.3)
30.2 months
(95% CI 25.0–NR)
ENZ → AAP (85) - 9.7 months
(95% CI 7.7–11.8)
(p < 0.001)
29.5 months
(95% CI 24.4–NR)
(p = 0.599)
Mori
et al. [12]
Retrospective AAP → ENZ (23) NR 9 months Not statistically
different
(p = 0.62)
ENZ → AAP (46) 11 months (p = 0.043) 7 months (p = 0.049)
Maughan
et al. [11]
Retrospective AAP → ENZ (65) 19.5 months
(95% CI 15.5–22.3)
17.5 months
(95% CI 14.0–19.5)
33.3 months
(95% CI 2.4–NR)
ENZ → AAP (16) 13.0 months
(95% CI 10.3–21.2)
12.3 months
(95% CI 8.9–20.5)
29.9 months
(95% CI 18.8–NR)

**—For Khalaf et al., the primary endpoint was time to second PSA progression, and these data are reported under median PSA-PFS column; N—number of patients; PFS—progression-free survival; OS—overall survival; AAP—abiraterone acetate and prednisone; ENZ—enzalutamide; NR - not reached; CI—confidence interval; ##—For Terada et al., PSA-PFS and OS data have been converted from days to months for consistency.