Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;11(3):367. doi: 10.3390/cells11030367

Table 6.

The IC50 values determined in antioxidant tests.

Sample IC50
DPPH [μg/mL] ABTS [μg/mL] CHEL [μg/mL]
CHi 21.73 ± 0.13 e,f,g,h,i,k,l 4.14 ± 0.10 e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l 3.54 ± 0.15 f
CHi-1 32.37 ± 0.19 a,e,f,g,h,i,k,l 5.48 ± 0.12 a,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l 182.67 ± 4.19 a,e,f,g,h,i,m
CHi-2 8.83 ± 0.10 a,b,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l 1.68 ± 0.03 a,b,e,f,g,h,i,k,l 2.94 ± 0.03 b,f
CHi-3 13.69 ± 0.14 a,b,c,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l 2.74 ± 0.11 a,b,c,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l 4.04 ± 0.16 b,f
CHi-4 5.40 ± 0.10 a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l 0.90 ± 0.02 a,b,c,d,e,f,i,j,k,l 1.19 ± 0.05 b,f,i,m
CHs 10.16 ± 0.02 j,k,l 1.92 ± 0.13 j,l 1.73 ± 0.10 j,m
CHs-1 18.15 ± 0.13 e,j,k,l 1.53 ± 0.09 e,j 76.50 ± 1.45 e,j,m
CHs-2 4.15 ± 0.05 e,f,j,k,l 0.80 ± 0.02 e,f,j,k,l 1.10 ± 0.03 f,j,m
CHs-3 3.43 ± 0.02 e,f,g,j,k 0.68 ± 0.05 e,f,j,k,l 1.01 ± 0.01 f,j,m
CHs-4 2.08 ± 0.03 e,f,g,h,k,l 0.37 ± 0.01 e,f,g,h,j,k,l 0.50 ± 0.01 f,j,m
quercetin 2.05 ± 0.10 3.27 ± 0.23 6.24 ± 0.19
AA 4.75 ± 0.16 1.73 ± 0.09 nt
Trolox 3.68 ± 0.09 1.31 ± 0.05 nt
Na2EDTA*2H2O nt nt 4.15 ± 0.10

Data were expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3. AA—ascorbic acid; Na2EDTA*2H2O—ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, disodium dihydrate; nt—not tested; CHi—crude extract of C. hissaricus, CHs—crude extract of C. hsingshangensis, CHi-1/CHs-1—water fraction, CHi-2/CHs-2—diethyl ether fraction, CHi-3/CHs-3—butanol fraction, CHi-4/CHs-4—ethyl acetate fraction; ABTS—2,2′-azino-bis-(3-ethyl-benzothiazole-6-sulfonic acid); CHEL—metal chelating activity. Statistical analysis: a—significantly different results compared to CHi; b—significantly different results compared to CHi-1; c—significantly different results compared to CHi-2; d—significantly different results compared to CHi-3; e—significantly different results compared to CHs; f—significantly different results compared to CHs-1; g—significantly different results compared to CHs-2; h—significantly different results compared to CHs-3; i—significantly different results compared to CHs-4; j—significantly different results compared to quercetin; k—significantly different results compared to AA; l—significantly different results compared to Trolox; m—significantly different results compared to Na2EDTA*2H2O; One-Way ANOVA test, followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparison test, p < 0.05.