Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031063

Table A5.

Comparison of all face masks including face mask condition and sex—linear mixed model 2.

Model Outcome Parameter Dependent Variable Degree of Freedom F-Value p-Value
2 PWC130 Face mask condition 3 8.931 <0.0001
sex 1 14.220 0.001
SpO2 Face mask condition 3 0.787 0.504
sex 1 0.002 0.964
tcPCO2 Face mask condition 3 2.166 0.097
sex 1 5.138 0.030
Systolic blood presurre Face mask condition 3 0.143 0.934
sex 1 7.750 0.009
Diastolic blood presurre Face mask condition 3 0.283 0.837
sex 1 5.459 0.025
Breathing frequency Face mask condition 3 0.367 0.777
sex 1 0.034 0.854
Perceived respiratory effort Face mask condition 3 16.927 <0.0001
sex 1 7.925 0.008
Perceived physical exertion Face mask condition 3 1.125 0.342
sex 1 8.923 0.005
2 PWC150 Face mask condition 3 1.484 0.225
sex 1 14.091 0.001
SpO2 Face mask condition 3 0.416 0.742
sex 1 7.443 0.011
tcPCO2 Face mask condition 3 4.278 0.008
sex 1 1.338 0.258
Systolic blood presurre Face mask condition 3 0.834 0.481
sex 1 8.429 0.008
Diastolic blood presurre Face mask condition 3 0.293 0.830
sex 1 1.104 0.304
Breathing frequency Face mask condition 3 1.143 0.336
sex 1 1.356 0.253
Perceived respiratory effort Face mask condition 3 16.375 <0.0001
sex 1 4.897 0.034
Perceived physical exertion at PWC150 Face mask condition 3 1.253 0.295
sex 1 8.318 0.007

Bonferroni corrected alpha level is 0.003. Statistically significant results are shaded in grey and written in bold letters.