Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;19(3):1080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031080

Table 4.

Testing the moderating effects of place attachment.

Variable Residential Satisfaction Urban Settlement Intention
Model 7 Model 8 Model 9 Model 10
Key variable −0.078 ** (0.033) −0.077 ** (0.033)
  Air pollution perception −0.078 ** (0.033) −0.077 ** (0.033)
Moderating variable
  Place attachment 0.271 *** (0.040) 0.273 *** (0.042) 0.114 *** (0.023) 0.123 *** (0.024)
Mediating variable
  Residential satisfaction 0.357 *** (0.020) 0.361 *** (0.020)
Interaction 0.004 (0.025) 0.024 ** (0.013)
Control variable
  Gender −0.148 ** (0.059) −0.113 ** (0.045) −0.032 (0.037) −0.033 (0.037)
  Age 0.050 (0.049) 0.038 (0.037) 0.021 (0.030) 0.020 (0.033)
  Edu1 −0.048 (0.077) 0.036 (0.059) 0.116 ** (0.047) 0.117 ** (0.047)
  Edu2 −0.062 (0.101) 0.047 (0.076) 0.041 (0.097) 0.092 * (0.062)
  Edu3 0.014 (0.040) 0.013 (0.119) 0.089 (0.062) 0.045 (0.097)
  Time spent in Hangzhou 0.003 (0.034) 0.002 (0.026) 0.029 * (0.021) 0.028 * (0.021)
  Annual income 0.051 * (0.031) 0.039 * (0.023) 0.014 (0.019) 0.014 (0.019)
  Career development expectations 0.214 *** (0.040) 0.213 *** (0.040) 0.103 *** (0.025) 0.100 *** (0.025)
  Family and friends 0.211 ** (0.097) 0.330 ** (0.091) 0.235 ** (0.089) 0.326 ** (0.063)
  Constant 0.949 (0.198) −0.950 *** (0.199) 3.513 *** (0.124) 3.516 *** (0.123)
R 2 0.227 0.227 0.306 0.438
Adjusted R2 0.219 0.219 0.301 0.431
ΔR2 0.061 0.00 0.118 0.132
F 28.717 *** 26.082 75.341 *** 68.948 ***
VIF 1.981 2.227 1.885 1.888

Note: Standard errors in parentheses; * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01 with two-tailed test; all the regression coefficients were non-standardized.