Engels et al., 2001 [46] |
-
-
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA, Armsden and Greenberg, 1987 [61])
-
-
Adolescent version of the Interpersonal Behavior (SIG; Arrindell, De Groot, and Walburg, 1984 [93]; Bijstra, Jackson, and Bosma, 1995 [94])
|
|
-
-
Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965 [71])
-
-
Depressive Mood List (Kandel and Davies, 1982 [72])
|
Higher parental attachment predicts development of adolescents’ interpersonal skills such as competencies in initiating and maintaining, criticizing, or being assertive. |
Not reported |
Mikulincer et al., 2001 [79] |
|
-
-
Acquaintance Description Form (ADF-F; Wright, 1984, 1985 [73,95])
-
-
Adaptation version Network of Relationships Inventory (NRI; Furman and Buhrmester, 1985 [66])
|
- |
Adolescents with secure attachment give greater importance to closeness, support, and affiliation with their friends and peers. |
YES |
Markiewicz et al., 2001 [80] |
|
-
-
Adolescents’ prosocial behavior scale was taken from Feelings and Behavior Questionnaire (Statistics Canada, 1995 [96])
-
-
Friendship qualities scale (FQS; Bukowski et al., 1994 [67])
|
-
-
Perceptions of the Marital Relationship scale from the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Wright, 1985 [73])
-
-
The Perception of Mother’s Social Network scale was constructed from the Social Relationship Network Questionnaire (Veroff, 1996 [97])
|
Adolescents with secure attachment present better quality in their relationships with friends. |
Not reported |
Sánchez-Queija and Oliva, 2003 [81] |
|
-
-
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA, Armsden and Greenberg, 1987 [61])
-
-
Intimacy Scale (Sharabany, 1994 [68])
|
- |
Adolescents with secure attachment present better affective relations with their friends, characterized by closeness and identity. |
YES |
Weimer et al., 2004 [70] |
|
-
-
Observation and coding of friendship interaction processes
-
-
Coding categories: High and low self-disclosure, gossip, problem solving, connectedness, individuality, transactive statements, planning, and extraneous comments
-
-
Friendship Qualities Scale (FQS; Bukowski, Hoza, and Boivin, 1994 [67])
|
- |
Adolescents with secure attachment establish relationships with friends based on intimacy, connection, and fluidity. |
Not reported |
Zimmermann, 2004 [82] |
|
|
|
Adolescents with secure attachment present a more elaborate concept of friendship, better quality relations, and greater intimacy with peers. |
Not reported |
Saferstein et al., 2005 [85] |
|
|
- |
Adolescents with secure attachment report greater quality in their interactions, comradeship, transcendence in the problems that arise in interactions, and les conflict with peers. |
YES |
Allen et al., 2007 [64] |
-
-
Adaptation version of the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) and Q-set (Kobak et al., 1993 [101])
-
-
Observed autonomy and relatedness with parent
-
-
Coding categories: promoting relatedness, undermining relatedness, promoting autonomy, and undermining autonomy
|
-
-
A modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale (Straus, 1979 [102])
-
-
Supportive Behavior Coding System (Allen, Hall, Insabella, Land, Marsh and Porter, 2001 [103])
-
-
The Autonomy-Relatedness Coding System for Peer Interaction (Allen, Porter, and McFarland, 2001 [104]).
-
-
Measure of popularity following the procedure described in Coie, Dodge, and Coppotelli (1982) [105]
-
-
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (Armsden and Greenberg, 1987 [61])
|
-
-
Child Depression Inventory (Kovacs and Beck, 1977 [75])
-
-
Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach and Edelbrock, 1991 [76])
|
Secure attachment and positive tone with parents in disagreements is linked to positive relations based on emotional support, popularity, and les pressure with peers. |
Not reported |
Dykas et al., 2008 [51] |
|
-
-
Modified version of social behavior and victimization assessments developed by Parkhurst and Asher (1992) [106]
-
-
Peer acceptance assessment using an instrument devised by Asher and Dodge (1986) [107]
-
-
Nomination procedure A modified version of the Children’s Expectations of Social Behavior Questionnaire–Peer Version (Rudolph, Hammen, and Burge, 1995 [108])
|
- |
Adolescents with secure attachment are perceived as more prosocial and are more accepted by peers. |
Not reported |
Feeney et al., 2008 [87] |
|
-
-
Modified version of scale support-seeking and support provision by Collins and Feeney, 2000 [109], and Feeney, 2004 [110]
-
-
Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR; Brennan, Clark, and Shaver, 1998 [111])
|
- |
Adolescents with secure attachment representations present greater support-seeking and support-giving behaviors with strangers of similar age. |
Not reported |
Bauminger et al., 2008 [88] |
|
-
-
Intimacy Scale (Shulman, Laursen, Kalman, and Karpovsky, 1997 [113])
-
-
Adolescent Sense of Coherence Scale (Margalit and Ziv, 1997 [114])
-
-
Self-Disclosure Scale (Shulman et al., 1997 [113])
|
- |
Avoidant and anxious attachment are related to less intimacy with peers, mediated by low self-coherence and self-disclosure. |
YES |
Shomaker et al., 2009 [89] |
-
-
Network of Relationships Inventory (NRI): Behavioral Systems Version (Furman, 2000 [115])
-
-
Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, and Main, 1985 [60])
-
-
Behavioral Systems Questionnaire (BSQ; Furman and Wehner, 1999 [116])
|
-
-
Adolescent–close friend dyads.
-
-
Using Interactional Dimensions Coding System (IDCS; Julien, Markman and Van Widenfelt, 1986 [117])
|
- |
Dismissing working models are associated with poorer focus on problem discussions and weaker communication skills. |
YES |
Carr, 2009 [59] |
-
-
Adolescent Attachment Questionnaire (AAQ; West, Rose, Spreng, eldon-Keller and Adam, 1998 [118])
|
|
- |
Adolescent dyads with secure attachment show characteristics of more positive friendship than those with one member with insecure attachment. |
Not reported |
Boling et al., 2011 [86] |
-
-
Parental Attachment Questionnaire (PAQ; Kenny, Moilanen, Lomax, and Brabeck, 1993 [120])
|
-
-
Self-perception Profile for Adolescents (Harter, 1988 [69])
-
-
Friendship Qualities Questionnaire
-
-
(FQQ; Berndt and Keefe, 1995 [121])
|
- |
Secure attachment is related with adolescent social competence and higher quality in friendship with peers. Adolescents with secure attachment feel comfortable exploring their environment and interacting. |
Not reported |
Sánchez-Queija and Oliva, 2015 [83] |
|
-
-
Intimacy Scale (Sharabany, 1994 [68])
-
-
Peer-group Attachment Scale (Armsden and Greenberg, 1987 [61])
|
- |
Adolescents with secure attachment present greater closeness and intimacy toward their peers and best friends, demonstrating a similar tendency across ages. |
YES |
Venta et al., 2015 [90] |
-
-
Child Attachment Interview (CAI; Target, Fonagy, Shmueli-Goetz, Datta, and Schneider, 2007 [122])
|
|
-
-
Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC; Dziobek, Fleck, Kalbe, Rogers, Hassenstab, Brand, …, and Convit, 2006 [77])
|
Adolescents with disorganized attachment have difficulty in their interpersonal relations with peers, with mentalizing mediating |
Not reported |
Chow et al., 2016 [91] |
|
|
- |
Avoidant attachment is associated with past perceptions of exclusion in friendship and a decrease in intimacy. |
Not reported |
Wong et al., 2020 [92] |
-
-
Comprehensive Adolescent-Parent Attachment Inventory (CAPAI; Moretti, McKay, and Holland, 2000 [125])
|
|
- |
Adolescents with anxious attachment are more likely to establish negative interactions with friends. The older they are, the worse their relations. |
YES |
Loeb et al., 2020 [84] |
|
-
-
Supportive Behavior Task (using the Supportive Behavior Coding System) (Allen et al., 2001 [103])
-
-
Aggressive Attitudes Questionnaire (Slaby and Guerra, 1988 [126])
-
-
Adolescent Self-Perception Profile (Harter, 1988 [69])
|
-
-
International Personality Inventory Pool (Goldberg, Johnson, Eber, Hogan, Ashton, Cloninger, and Gough; 2006 [78])
|
Adolescents with secure attachment demonstrate more support-seeking behaviors with peers, developing positive relations in later stages, whereas ambivalent insecure attachment is associated with decreased support-seeking. |
Not reported |