Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 20;11(3):347. doi: 10.3390/cells11030347

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Commonly used parameters to describe nuclear shape. (a) Visual representation and mathematical definition of 3 routinely used nuclear shape descriptors: solidity, form factor (or circularity) and eccentricity. Values for each of these range from 0 to 1. (b,c) Example of nuclear shape analysis on DAPI-stained nuclei in fibroblasts derived from a patient with Nestor-Guillermo progeria syndrome (NGPS). Nuclear shapes in (b) were detected in CellProfiler; (c) Comparison of the values of three nuclear shape descriptors for the four detected nuclei shown in (b), with the colours of the bars corresponding to the colours of the nuclear masks in (b). Elongated shapes are better distinguished from rounder shapes by eccentricity than by solidity, while the highly lobulated nuclear shape is well distinguished using solidity and form factor. (d) Lamin A/C staining of a representative nucleus in a healthy donor fibroblast and a nucleus in a fibroblast from a patient with HGPS. The HGPS nucleus shows lamin invaginations, absent in the control nucleus, and a bulged nuclear contour. (e) Analysis of >50 nuclei in control and HGPS fibroblasts of similar cell passage yields significant differences for the nuclear solidity (p < 0.001) and eccentricity (p = 0.0003) but not for the form factor (p = 0.24). More elaborate nuclear shape analyses such as mean negative curvature calculation or elliptic Fourier transform (see text for details) are also able to distinguish control from HGPS nuclei.