Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 1;19(3):1694. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031694

Table 3.

Very/extremely effective support providers during the pandemic.

Typologies of Services Total
(n = 319)
Germany
(n = 146)
Italy
(n = 173)
p
Public health services/professionals 42 (13.2%) 25 (17.1%) 17 (9.8%) 0.000
Public social services/professionals 28 (8.8%) 19 (13%) 9 (5.3%) 0.000
Private care services/providers 74 (23.5%) 39 (26.9%) 35 (20.6%) 0.000
Voluntary organisations 19 (6%) 2 (1.4%) 17 (9.9%) 0.000
Friends/Neighbours 75 (23.8%) 40 (27.8%) 35 (20.4%) 0.000
Migrant/private care workers 52 (16.5%) 5 (3.5%) 47 (27.7%) 0.000
Carer/patient organisation(s) 54 (17.5%) 22 (22.2%) 22 (13.7%) 0.003
General Practitioner 86 (27.3%) 42 (29%) 44 (25.9%) 0.010
Family members 128 (40.7%) 71 (48.6%) 57 (33.7%) 0.013
Church/Religious organisations 19 (6%) 11 (7.5%) 8 (4.7%) 0.029
Pharmacies 124 (39.8%) 66 (45.8%) 58 (34.7%) 0.203