Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 28;19(3):1514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031514

Table 4.

Multiple regression analysis of work percentage left on positive meaning and greater-good motivations.

Positive Meaning Greater-Good Motivations
B (SE B) 95% CI p B (SE B) 95% CI p
Age 0.01 (0.01) [–0.00, 0.02] 0.117 0.00 (0.01) [–0.01, 0.02] 0.545
Gender 0.26 (0.15) [–0.03, 0.55] 0.080 0.10 (0.18) [–0.24, 0.45] 0.559
Living Situation 0.18 (0.18) [–0.18, 0.53] 0.326 0.47 (0.21) [0.06, 0.89] 0.026
Increased Care –0.22 (0.25) [–0.70, 0.26] 0.371 0.21 (0.25) [–0.35, 0.78] 0.459
Supervisory Function –0.45 (0.17) [–0.78, –0.13] 0.006 –0.35 (0.29) [–0.73, 0.03] 0.073
Days in Lockdown –0.01 (0.01) [–0.03, 0.02] 0.699 –0.04 (0.19) [–0.07, –0.00] 0.032
Normal Job Hours 0.02 (0.01) [0.01, 0.03] 0.001 0.01 (0.01) [–0.00, 0.03] 0.130
Work % Left 0.00 (0.00) [–0.00, 0.00] 0.899 0.01 (0.00) [0.00, 0.01] 0.014
Model N = 408; R2 = 0.08, F (8, 399) = 4.38, p < 0.001 N = 408; R2 = 0.06, F (8, 399) = 3.35, p < 0.001