Table 8.
Multiple regression analysis of work perceptions on cyberostracism and cyberincivility.
| Cyberostracism | Cyberincivility | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE B) | 95% CI | p | B (SE B) | 95% CI | p | |
| Age | –0.01 (0.00) | [–0.02, –0.01] | 0.000 | –0.00 (0.00) | [–0.01, 0.00] | 0.546 |
| Gender | –0.07 (0.09) | [–0.25, 0.12] | 0.483 | –0.11 (0.06) | [–0.23, 0.02] | 0.094 |
| Living Situation | 0.25 (0.11) | [0.03, 0.46] | 0.027 | 0.04 (0.07) | [–0.10, 0.19] | 0.571 |
| Increased Care | 0.02 (0.14) | [–0.27, 0.30] | 0.918 | 0.10 (0.10) | [–0.09, 0.29] | 0.288 |
| Supervisory Function | –0.09 (0.10) | [–0.29, 0.11] | 0.381 | –0.20 (0.07) | [–0.33, 0.07] | 0.003 |
| Days in Lockdown | –0.00 (0.01) | [–0.02, 0.01] | 0.656 | –0.01 (0.01) | [–0.02, 0.01] | 0.273 |
| Normal Job Hours | 0.01 (0.00) | [–0.00, 0.02] | 0.072 | 0.00 (0.00) | [–0.00, 0.01] | 0.131 |
| Work % Left | 0.00 (0.00) | [–0.00, 0.00] | 0.857 | –0.00 (0.00) | [–0.00, 0.00] | 0.439 |
| Normal Telework % | 0.00 (0.00) | [0.00, 0.01] | 0.026 | 0.00 (0.00) | [–0.00, 0.00] | 0.296 |
| Increase Telework % | 0.00 (0.00) | [–0.00, 0.00] | 0.997 | 0.00 (0.00) | [–0.00, 0.00] | 0.724 |
| Positive Meaning | –0.01 (0.04) | [–0.10, 0.07] | 0.756 | –0.02 (0.03) | [–0.08, 0.03] | 0.413 |
| Greater-Good | –0.02 (0.03) | [–0.08, 0.04] | 0.602 | 0.00 (0.02) | [–0.04, 0.04] | 0.852 |
| Identification (O) | –0.07 (0.05) | [–0.16, 0.02] | 0.142 | –0.06 (0.03) | [–0.12, 0.01] | 0.070 |
| Identification (C) | 0.01 (0.05) | [–0.09, 0.10] | 0.914 | 0.01 (0.03) | [–0.05, 0.08] | 0.664 |
| Job Insecurity | 0.05 (0.02) | [0.01, 0.10] | 0.012 | 0.03 (0.01) | [0.00, 0.06] | 0.027 |
| N = 318; R2 = 0.13, F (15, 302) = 3.01, p < 0.001 | N = 318; R2 = 0.11, F (15, 302) = 2.60, p = 0.001 | |||||