Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 7;11(3):860. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030860

Table 1.

TEG® 5000 and ROTEM® delta “legacy device” parameters and reference ranges [7,27,35,37,38,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].

Parameter TEG® 5000 Analyzer 1 ROTEM® Delta Analyzer
Clot initiation: the time from the test start to amplitude = 2 mm R (Kaolin)/ACT (rTEG®)
Kaolin: 4.6–9.1 min
rTEG®: 86–118 s
CT
INTEM: 137–246 s
EXTEM: 42–74 s
Clot formation and clot kinetics: the time taken to achieve a level of clot strength, amplitude = 20 mm K
Kaolin: 0.8–2.1 min
rTEG®: 1–2 min
CFT
INTEM: 40–100 s
EXTEM: 46–148 s
Angle of clot formation α-angle
Kaolin: 53–72°
rTEG®: 64–80°
α-angle
INTEM: 71–82°
EXTEM: 63–81°
Maximum clot strength MA
Kaolin: 50–70 mm
rTEG®: 52–71 mm
MAff/CFF: 15–32 mm
MCF
INTEM: 52–72 mm
EXTEM: 49–71 mm
FIBTEM: 9–25 mm
Lysis 2
TEG®: rate of clot breakdown 30 min after MA is reached.
ROTEM®: the residual % of MCF amplitude when measured 30 min after CT (CLI30); the % reduction MCF amplitude at a given timepoint (ML)
LY30
Kaolin: 0–7.5%
rTEG®: 0–7.5%
CLI30: 94–100%
ML: <15%

Abbreviations: activated clotting time (ACT); clot formation time (CFT); clot lysis index at 30 min (CLI30); clotting time (CT); extrinsic thromboelastometry (EXTEM); fibrin-based thromboelastometry (FIBTEM); intrinsic thromboelastometry (INTEM); kinetics (K); lysis at 30 min (LY30); maximum amplitude (MA); maximum clot firmness (MCF); maximum lysis (ML); RapidTEG (rTEG®); reaction time (R); rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®); thromboelastography (TEG®); TEG functional fibrinogen (MAff/CFF). 1 For the TEG® 6s and the TEG® 5000, the manufacturer (Haemonetics, Braintree, Massachusetts) makes clear that the ranges are interchangeable, but that any difference in the values is a consequence of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methodology used for the TEG® 6s values. Additionally, the manufacturer’s ranges are not globally prescriptive, as every laboratory must establish their own reference intervals [48]. 2 The values for clinically significant fibrinolysis vary greatly in the literature.