Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;11(3):615. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030615

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical parameters, semiquantitative PET/CT parameters and radiomics features between the two scanners.

Parameters p-Value
Clinical
      Age 0.787
      Sex 0.522
      Diameters at ultrasound 0.446
Semiquantitative PET/CT parameters
      SUVmax 0.046
      SUVmean 0.118
      SUVlbm 0.119
      SUVbsa 0.076
      MTV 0.595
      TLG 0.869
Radiomics features
      Histo skewness 0.193
      Histo kurtosis 0.924
      Histo excess kurtosis 0.924
      Histo entropy_log10 0.023
      Histo entropy_log2 0.024
      Histo energy 0.017
      Shape volume_mL 0.211
      Shape volume_vx 0.560
      Shape sphericity 0.088
      Shape compacity 0.518
      GLCM homogeneity 0.104
      GLCM energy 0.638
      GLCM contrast 0.132
      GLCM correlation 0.889
      GLCM entropy_log10 0.319
      GLCM entropy_log2 0.315
      GLCM dissimilarity 0.145
      GLRLM SRE 0.123
      GLRLM LRE 0.113
      GLRLM LGRE 0.026
      GLRLM HGRE 0.069
      GLRLM SRLGE 0.036
      GLRLM SRHGE 0.069
      GLRLM LRLGE 0.098
      GLRLM LRHGE 0.135
      GLRLM GLNU 0.260
      GLRLM RLNU 0.962
      GLRLM RP 0.126
      NGLDM coarseness 0.471
      NGLDM contrast 0.476
      NGLDM busyness 0.006
      GLZLM SZE 0.017
      GLZLM LZE 0.168
      GLZLM LGZE 0.053
      GLZLM HGZE 0.086
      GLZLM SZLGE 0.069
      GLZLM SZHGE 0.041
      GLZLM LZLGE 0.102
      GLZLM LZHGE 0.561
      GLZLM GLNU 0.366
      GLZLM ZLNU 0.026
      GLZLM ZP 0.093