Table 3.

Random intercept/random slope model of the effect of treatment, time, and defect diagnosis on the measured dentinal sensibility.

Variable	Coefficient	Standard Error	z	p	95% Confidence Interval
					Lower Bound	Upper Bound
Treatment	0.81	0.17	4.77 **	<0.001	0.48	1.15
Enamelast* hard tissue erosion	0.18	0.13	1.32	0.189	−0.09	0.44
Enamelast* cuneiform defect	0.17	0.14	1.22	0.222	−0.11	0.45
Enamelast* pathological abrasion	0.11	0.15	0.70	0.481	−0.19	0.40
Tiefenfluorid* gingival recession	−0.15	0.13	−1.21	0.225	−0.40	0.09
Tiefenfluorid* hard tissue erosion	−0.05	0.12	−0.40	0.690	−0.29	0.19
Tiefenfluorid* cuneiform defect	0.06	0.13	0.44	0.662	−0.20	0.31
Enamelast* 7 days	−0.09	0.03	−2.72 **	0.007	−0.15	−0.02
Enamelast* 14 days	−0.47	0.05	−9.53 **	<0.001	−0.57	−0.38
Enamelast* 1 month	−0.93	0.07	−13.33 **	<0.001	−1.06	−0.79
Enamelast* 3 months	−1.45	0.09	−16.11 **	<0.001	−1.63	−1.28
Enamelast* 6 months	−3.43	0.11	−30.84 **	<0.001	−3.65	−3.22
Tiefenfluorid* before treatment	−0.78	0.10	−8.12 **	<0.001	−1.00	−0.60
Tiefenfluorid* 7 days	−0.30	0.08	−4.00 **	<0.001	−0.45	−0.15
Tiefenfluorid* 14 days	−0.06	0.06	−1.08	0.281	−0.17	0.049
Tiefenfluorid* 1 month	0.03	0.04	0.90	0.367	−0.04	0.10

** Statistically significant at p < 0.01. Wald χ² = 57,878.45, p ≤ 0.001. Enamelast* gingival recession, Tiefenfluorid* cuneiform defect, Enamelast* before treatment, Tiefenfluorid* 3 months, and Tiefenfluorid* 6 months were omitted because of collinearity.