Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;22(3):1096. doi: 10.3390/s22031096

Table 6.

Comparison of main simulation results in the ascent and descent processes.

Direction
of
Motion
Depth-
Control
Strategy
Controller
Parameters
Setup
Mean Depth Steady-State Error
(m)
Settling
Time
(s)
Ascent
process
PID kp = 260, ki = 80, kd = 50 3.5 243
ITCS k1 = 200, k2 = 6, k3 = 10 2.7 225
QGA–ITCS k1 = 183.212, k2 = 12.079, k3 = 25.167 2.4 214
GACPSO–ITCS k1 = 156.856, k2 = 5.397,
k3 = 16.351
1.9 206
Descent
process
PID kp = 8, ki = 1.5, kd = 30 3.3 262
ITCS k1 = 180, k2 = 8, k3 = 20 2.5 236
QGA–ITCS k1 = 156.856, k2 = 5.397,
k3 = 16.351
2.1 227
GACPSO–ITCS k1 = 118.037, k2 = 7.247,
k3 = 18.521
1.8 218