Table 3.
Values showing significance of the effects of plant growth elevations and habitats from Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks (Tukey test) and Spearman rank order correlation for the bacterial communities of S. purpurea.
Samples a | Pairwise Comparison b | Kruskal–Wallis One-Way ANOVA on Ranks | Tukey Test | Spearman Rank Order Correlation | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | p | q | p | CC c | p | ||
Rs | GS vs. QH | 0.0315 | 0.859 | 0.972 | ≤0.0001 | ||
GS vs. XZ | 0.0219 | 0.882 | 0.947 | ≤0.0001 | |||
QH vs. XZ | 0.184 | 0.668 | 0.951 | ≤0.0001 | |||
L | GS vs. QH | 6.694 | 0.01 | 3.659 | <0.05 | 0.063 | 0.739 |
GS vs. XZ | 3.925 | 0.048 | 2.802 | <0.05 | 0.746 | ≤0.0001 | |
QH vs. XZ | 0.0789 | 0.779 | 0.187 | 0.319 | |||
R | GS vs. QH | 0.0919 | 0.762 | 0.904 | ≤0.0001 | ||
GS vs. XZ | 1.181 | 0.277 | 0.575 | 0.000958 | |||
QH vs. XZ | 2.078 | 0.149 | 0.583 | 0.000779 | |||
GS | Rs vs. L | 0.0177 | 0.894 | −0.443 | 0.0145 | ||
Rs vs. R | 0.184 | 0.668 | −0.27 | 0.147 | |||
L vs. R | 0.735 | 0.391 | 0.802 | ≤0.0001 | |||
QH | Rs vs. L | 7.4 | 0.007 | 3.847 | <0.05 | 0.495 | 0.00568 |
Rs vs. R | 1.399 | 0.237 | −0.345 | 0.0619 | |||
L vs. R | 0.614 | 0.433 | 0.196 | 0.296 | |||
XZ | Rs vs. L | 2.941 | 0.086 | −0.355 | 0.0538 | ||
Rs vs. R | 0.184 | 0.668 | −0.523 | 0.00315 | |||
L vs. R | 4.918 | 0.027 | 3.136 | <0.05 | 0.695 | ≤0.0001 |
Eighteen pairwise analyses were performed comprising each of the three possible pairings of the three different elevations and both collected samples (rhizosphere soil, leaves and roots) at the same elevation. Values in italics indicate significant differences or significant correlations. a Rs, rhizosphere soil; R, root; L, leaf. b GS, Gansu; QH, Qinghai; XZ, Tibet. c CC, correlation coefficient.