Table 1.
Comparison between the proposed and existing enterprise data sharing solutions.
Authors | Year | Objective | Technologies | Merits | Demerits |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teslya et al. [13] | 2017 | Proposed a blockchain-based IIOT trust information sharing platform | Blockchain, Smart Contracts, Smart-M3 | It can single out the search for information in the detachment. | Leading to a slower rate of information entering the smart space |
Wang et al. [14] | 2018 | To use blockchain double-link structure combined with proxy re-encryption for data sharing | Blockchain, Proxy re-encryption | The two chains store original data and transaction data separately, combined with proxy re-encryption to achieve reliable data sharing | There is no detailed experimental process to prove the actual effect of the program, and the safety analysis is not detailed enough |
Zhang et al. [15] | 2018 | To realize data sharing in the electronic medical system through alliance chain | Blockchain, Bilinear maps and complexity assumptions | A detailed description of the sharing of medical data through the alliance chain, and detailed experimental analysis | Security analysis is not complete enough |
Ra Lee et al. [16] | 2019 | To use blockchain registry and FHIR to share healthcare data | Blockchain, FHIR | Improve query efficiency by storing the registry in the blockchain and storing the original data in the database | There is no analysis process, and the plan is not complete enough |
Kumar S et al. [17] | 2020 | To provide controlled access and secure transmission of patient health information between various healthcare organizations | Hyperledger Fabric | Investigated related literature and provided detailed algorithms and steps | No comparison with other programs, no experiments to demonstrate the actual effect of the program |