Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 2;22(3):1146. doi: 10.3390/s22031146

Table 1.

Comparison between the proposed and existing enterprise data sharing solutions.

Authors Year Objective Technologies Merits Demerits
Teslya et al. [13] 2017 Proposed a blockchain-based IIOT trust information sharing platform Blockchain, Smart Contracts, Smart-M3 It can single out the search for information in the detachment. Leading to a slower rate of information entering the smart space
Wang et al. [14] 2018 To use blockchain double-link structure combined with proxy re-encryption for data sharing Blockchain, Proxy re-encryption The two chains store original data and transaction data separately, combined with proxy re-encryption to achieve reliable data sharing There is no detailed experimental process to prove the actual effect of the program, and the safety analysis is not detailed enough
Zhang et al. [15] 2018 To realize data sharing in the electronic medical system through alliance chain Blockchain, Bilinear maps and complexity assumptions A detailed description of the sharing of medical data through the alliance chain, and detailed experimental analysis Security analysis is not complete enough
Ra Lee et al. [16] 2019 To use blockchain registry and FHIR to share healthcare data Blockchain, FHIR Improve query efficiency by storing the registry in the blockchain and storing the original data in the database There is no analysis process, and the plan is not complete enough
Kumar S et al. [17] 2020 To provide controlled access and secure transmission of patient health information between various healthcare organizations Hyperledger Fabric Investigated related literature and provided detailed algorithms and steps No comparison with other programs, no experiments to demonstrate the actual effect of the program