Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;22(3):939. doi: 10.3390/s22030939

Table 3.

Total number of intervals identified as “stress” (in %) for each classifier and each subject in the two driving situations. The numeric difference between them (with traffic–no traffic) is also displayed.

SVM
Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean (%)
% 1 Traffic 48.18 54.40 43.67 36.78 53.23 77.04 66.39 92.13 66.12 50.71 58.86
% 1 No traff. 16.67 49.62 47.01 60.87 38.66 6.50 33.87 9.24 24.58 56.10 34.31
% 1 Diff. 31.51 4.78 −3.34 −24.09 14.57 70.53 32.52 82.88 41.54 −5.38 24.55
RF
Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean (%)
% 1 Traffic 54.74 58.40 48.10 44.83 55.65 74.81 76.23 92.13 71.07 52.86 62.88
% 1 No traff. 24.51 56.49 47.01 66.96 25.21 2.44 45.16 19.33 31.36 73.17 39.16
% 1 Diff. 30.23 1.91 1.09 −22.13 30.44 72.38 31.07 72.80 39.72 −20.31 23.72
DT
Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean (%)
% 1 Traffic 51.09 52.00 46.84 41.38 62.90 77.04 69.67 85.83 60.33 45.00 59.20
% 1 No traff. 27.45 52.67 47.01 63.48 46.22 10.57 33.06 15.97 37.29 59.35 39.31
% 1 Diff. 23.64 −0.67 −0.17 −22.10 16.68 66.47 36.61 69.86 23.04 −14.35 19.90