Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;22(3):820. doi: 10.3390/s22030820

Table 2.

Comparison table for the properties of different bulk piezoelectric materials.

Materials Orientation/Cut Piezoelectric Coefficient (C/N), d33 Wave Velocity (m/s) Density (Kg/m3)
Quartz X axis 2.3 × 10−12 (d11) 3159 (Transverse) 2650
Quartz ST-cut 2.3 × 10−12 (d11) 3159 (Transverse) 2650
Lithium niobate Y, Z axis 6 × 10−12 3488 4650
Lithium niobate 128° Y, X axis 12 × 10−12 3992 4650
Lithium tantalate Y, Z axis 8 × 10−12 3230 7465
Lithium tantalate X-cut 5.7 × 10−12 3290 7465
Langasite 7 × 10−12 2723 (0°; 138,5°; 26,7°) 5746
PVDF film 20 × 10−12 2600 (Longitudinal) 1780
Lead zirconate titanate (PZT) 110 × 10−12 3900 (Longitudinal) 7500
Barium titanate 160 × 10−12 4392 5700
Materials Orientation/Cut Elastic Modulus (GPa) Curie Temperature (°C) Electromechanical Coupling Coefficient, k2 (%)
Quartz X axis 97.2 573 0.14
Quartz ST-cut 71.7 573 0.03
lithium niobate Y, Z axis 202 (C11) 1150 0.045
lithium niobate 128° Y, X axis 202 (C11) 1150 5–11.3
Lithium tantalate Y, Z axis 233.1 (C11) 607 0.66
Lithium tantalate X-cut 233.1 (C11) 607 0.75
Langasite 189.2 (C11) N/A 0.36
PVDF film 2.5 80–100 2.9
Lead zirconate titanate (PZT) 60 200 20–35
Barium titanate 110 120 0.34