Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 8;22(3):1287. doi: 10.3390/s22031287

Table 3.

Commands issued totals per command types, and per framing and appearance factors.

Commands
Issued
Overall
(n = 29)
Robot
(n = 11)
Puppy
(n = 18)
No Fur
(n = 15)
Fur
(n = 14)
“Very Lovely Aibo” 2.14 (0.26) 2.19 (0.42) 2.08 (0.31) 2.52 (0.32) 1.75 (0.41)
“Sit Down” 3.46 (0.67) 2.79 (1.08) 4.13 (0.79) 2.79 (1.05) 4.21 (0.82)
“Take a Picture” 2.07 (0.33) 2.02 (0.53) 2.12 (0.39) 2.39 (0.41) 1.75 (0.52)
“Sing a Song” 3.28 (0.52) 3.21 (0.85) 3.35 (0.62) 3.06 (0.65) 3.5 (0.83)
“Come Here” *** 9.08 (1.36) 8.33 (2.20) 9.83 (1.61) 9.12 (1.68) 9.04 (2.15)
“Happy
Birthday”
2.40 (0.52) 1.88 (0.83) 2.92 (0.61) 2.79 (0.64) 2.00 (0.81)
“Let’s Pose” 2.05 (0.36) 1.71 (0.45) 2.38 (0.33) 2.09 (0.34) 2.00 (0.44)
“If You’re Happy and You Know it” 2.02 (0.36) 1.75 (0.58) 2.29 (0.43) 2.25 (0.45) 1.79 (0.57)
Total 27.20 (2.82) 24.17 (4.55) 30.24 (3.34) 29.37 (3.48) 25.04 (2.82)

Values indicated are mean (standard error; SE) frequency repeats per experimental session, further split in either the framing of appearance conditions. *** indicates that “Come Here” was utilized at a significantly higher rate than any other command (p < 0.001 ***), while all the other commands were issued at similar rates compared to another.