Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;22(3):904. doi: 10.3390/s22030904

Table 7.

Results for 20-class classification, part II.

Technique Specificity Specificity Avg | Std Sensitivity Sensitivity Avg | Std
FSL proximity-based 24.9–26.8% 25.6% | 0.6% 27.7–29.7% 28.5% | 0.7%
Softmax-based classification 36.3–39.7% 37.6% | 1.2% 32.2–33.1% 32.6% | 0.3%
FSL + XGBoost 23.8–31.6% 27.7% | 2.6% 25.3–34.5% 29.7% | 3.4%
FSL + Random Forest 26.6–32.3% 28.4% | 2.2% 27.1–36.7% 31.0% | 3.6%
FSL + Decision Tree 19.4–28.5% 24.8% | 3.7% 19.9–30.0% 25.1% | 4.2%
FSL +KNN − 5 neighbors 24.0–33.7% 28.3% | 3.3% 25.3–36.1% 29.6% | 4.1%
FSL + KNN − 20 neighbors 24.9–31.1% 28.2% | 2.0% 26.7–36.5% 30.9% | 4.0%
FSL + SVM with linear kernel 25.6–34.1% 28.8% | 3.1% 28.2–36.7% 32.0% | 3.2%
FSL + SVM with polynomial kernel 26.0–33.0% 29.1% | 2.4% 23.4–34.0% 28.7% | 4.3%
FSL + SVM with RBF kernel 25.5–31.1% 28.9% | 2.7% 27.8–37.2% 31.4% | 3.9%
FSL + SVM with Sigmoid kernel 15.5–25.4% 20.8% | 3.4% 16.6–28.2% 23.7% | 4.6%