Table 7.
Technique | Specificity | Specificity Avg | Std | Sensitivity | Sensitivity Avg | Std |
---|---|---|---|---|
FSL proximity-based | 24.9–26.8% | 25.6% | 0.6% | 27.7–29.7% | 28.5% | 0.7% |
Softmax-based classification | 36.3–39.7% | 37.6% | 1.2% | 32.2–33.1% | 32.6% | 0.3% |
FSL + XGBoost | 23.8–31.6% | 27.7% | 2.6% | 25.3–34.5% | 29.7% | 3.4% |
FSL + Random Forest | 26.6–32.3% | 28.4% | 2.2% | 27.1–36.7% | 31.0% | 3.6% |
FSL + Decision Tree | 19.4–28.5% | 24.8% | 3.7% | 19.9–30.0% | 25.1% | 4.2% |
FSL +KNN − 5 neighbors | 24.0–33.7% | 28.3% | 3.3% | 25.3–36.1% | 29.6% | 4.1% |
FSL + KNN − 20 neighbors | 24.9–31.1% | 28.2% | 2.0% | 26.7–36.5% | 30.9% | 4.0% |
FSL + SVM with linear kernel | 25.6–34.1% | 28.8% | 3.1% | 28.2–36.7% | 32.0% | 3.2% |
FSL + SVM with polynomial kernel | 26.0–33.0% | 29.1% | 2.4% | 23.4–34.0% | 28.7% | 4.3% |
FSL + SVM with RBF kernel | 25.5–31.1% | 28.9% | 2.7% | 27.8–37.2% | 31.4% | 3.9% |
FSL + SVM with Sigmoid kernel | 15.5–25.4% | 20.8% | 3.4% | 16.6–28.2% | 23.7% | 4.6% |