Table 1.
Characteristics of included studies
| Study | Country | Prevalence | Quantity (eyes) | Diagnostic criteria | Age range (years) | Image | Refraction (D) | Study design |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas et al. [2, 24] | Germany | 59.6% | 582 | Chronic OAG | 62.9 ± 13.3 | disc camera | 0.2 ± 2.6 | Hospital-based |
| Park et al. [23] | Japan | 84.3% | 102 | NTG | 57.8 ± 13.4 | HRT | − 0.3 ± 2.3 | Hospital-based |
| Tezel et al. [22] | USA | 67.2% | 529 | POAG + NTG | 68.4 ± 12.6 | disc camera | Range, 3 to 3 | Hospital-based |
| Budde and Jonas [21] | Germany | 62.3% | 501 | POAG | 62.7 ± 14.7 | disc camera | − 0.4 ± 2.4 | Hospital-based |
| Emdadi et al. [20] | USA | 44.8% | 29 | POAG | 62.3 ± 13.5 | HRT | Range, 3 to 3 | Hospital-based |
| Kono et al. [19] | USA | 48.9% | 47 | POAG | 63.4 ± 13.9 | HRT | Range, 3 to 3 | Hospital-based |
| Sugiyama et al. [18] | Japan | 79.2% | 207 | OAG | 48.1 ± 9.4 | Fundus photography | NA | Population-based |
| Park et al. [17] | Korea | 97.0% | 33 | NTG | 48.0 ± 9.1 | HRT | < − 6 | Hospital-based |
| Budde and Jonas [16] | Germany | 58.9% | 168 | Chronic OAG | 55.8 ± 11.4 | Fundus photography | − 1.2 ± 2.7 | Hospital-based |
| Duan et al. [15] | China | 39.8% | 128 | POAG | 49.0 ± 15.6 | Fundus photography | − 1.1 ± 2.4 | Hospital-based |
| Wu et al. [13] | China | 77.8% | 27 | POAG | 63. 0 ± 13. 1 | HRA and ICGA | − 0.9 ± 2.4 | Hospital _based |
| Pan et al. [14] | China | 43.5% | 85 | POAG + NTG | 60.7 ± 11.0 | Fundus photography | − 0.3 ± 1.0 | Hospital _based |
| Xu et al. [12] | China | 68.8% | 93 | Glaucoma | 63.7 ± 10.1 | Fundus photography | − 0.5 ± 2.4 | Population-based |
| Teng et al. [11] | USA | 59.5% | 245 | OAG | 70.0 ± 12.3 | HRT | − 1.0 ± 2.4 | Hospital-based |
| Lee et al. [10] | Korea | 71.3% | 202 | POAG + NTG | 63.4 ± 11.3 | Fundus photography | − 0.3 ± 2.1 | Hospital-based |
| Hayashi et al. [9] | Japan | 84.0% | 100 | POAG | 55.6 ± 11.0 | SD-OCT | − 2.2 ± 2.2 | Hospital-based |
| Kim et al. [8] | Korea | 79.0% | 195 | POAG | 51.4 ± 13.9 | SD(EDI)-OCT | − 2.7 ± 3.8 | Hospital-based |
| Sullivan-Mee et al. [7] | USA | 76.2% | 63 | POAG | 67.2 ± 8.2 | SD-OCT | AL:24.41 mm | Hospital-based |
| Skaat et al. [6] | USA | 77.2% | 801 | Glaucoma | 61.4 ± 12.8 | Fundus photography | − 0.5 ± 1.9 | Hospital-based |
| Miki et al. [3] | Japan | 94.0% | 50 | OAG | 59.8 ± 9.5 | SS-OCT | − 2.4 ± 2.3 | Hospital-based |
| Mataki et al. [5] | Japan | 77.4% | 84 | POAG | 63.9 ± 12.4 | Fundus photography | − 0.9 ± 2.7 | Population-based |
| Lee et al.[33] | Korea | 100.0% | 88 | OAG |
53.9 ± 13.4 |
SS-OCT | − 0.66 ± 2.16 | Hospital-based |
| Lee et al.[34] | Korea | 50.6% | 77 | Glaucoma |
56.1 ± 12.7 |
SD-OCT | AL: 24.7 ± 1.6 mm | Hospital-based |
| Sayed et al.[35] | Egypt | 90.0% (82%) | 100 | POAG |
51.0 ± 8.8 |
SD-OCT (Fundus photography) | NA | Hospital-based |
Abbreviations: EDI-OCT enhanced depth imaging OCT, HRA Heidelberg Retinal angiography, HRT Heidelberg retina tomography, ICGA indocyanine green angiography, NTG normal tension glaucoma, OAG open-angle glaucoma, OCT optic coherent tomography, POAG primary open-angle glaucoma, SD-OCT spectral-domain OCT, SS-OCT swept-source OCT