Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;22(3):703. doi: 10.3390/s22030703

Table 5.

Bland–Altman comparison (in milliseconds) of the reference foot-on and heel-off events and the foot-on and heel-off events detected with the method from Briggs and Mazza [9] and our method from the cannon bone data. Accuracy (bias), precision (SD), and upper/lower limits of agreement (ULA and LLA) were indicated for the straight-line-on-hard-ground condition, and for the right forelimb and right hindlimb. For both events (foot-on and heel-off), the table shows results obtained from the same dataset with our method (Hatrisse & al.) and the Briggs and Mazza method [9].

Event Method Right Forelimb Right Hindlimb
Bias SD ULA LLA Bias SD ULA LLA
Foot-on Hatrisse & al. 3 ms 13 ms 27 ms −22 ms 4 ms 9 ms 22 ms −14 ms
Briggs and Mazza 3 ms 6 ms 16 ms −9 ms −3 ms 22 ms 40 ms −46 ms
Heel-off Hatrisse & al. 10 ms 13 ms 35 ms −15 ms −2 ms 12 ms 22 ms −25 ms
Briggs and Mazza −36 ms 51 ms 64 ms −137 ms −45 ms 31 ms 16 ms −106 ms