Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;11(3):285. doi: 10.3390/plants11030285

Table 3.

Comparison of mean pollen production per flower according to the present study and literature. Values in bold are within the 95% confidence interval of the means obtained in our study.

This Study:
I, India;
M, Moscow; R, Ryazan
Prieto-Baena et al. [27] Aboulaich et al. [28] Kaybeleva, Yudakova [32] Tormo-Molina et al. [42] Bai, Reddy [33] Smart et al. [40] Subba Reddi, Reddi [31] Cruden [30] McKone [34]
Bromus inermis 9861 (M)
9246 (R)
11,913
Chloris barbata 756 (I) 837 945
Dactylis glomerata 10,515 (M)
9120 (R)
10,425 6429 9240 5431 3900
Dactyloctenium aegyptium 522 (I) 555
Digitaria ciliaris 1131 (I) 1125
Digitaria sanguinalis 687 (I) 1234
Echinochloa crus-gali 741 (I) 1267
Eleusine indica 1086 (I) 810 1111
Elymus repens 11,940 (M)
11,445 (R)
16,230
Festuca pratensis 14,964 (M)
13,236 (R)
5151
Lolium perenne 14,847 (M)
15,987 (R)
16,200
Poa annua 1761 (M)
2310 (R)
1022 1216 5523
Poa pratensis 4575 (R) 3735
Poa trivialis 6378 (M) 5673 (R) 3386